Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical vs Kumho Ecsta PA31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 502 + 23 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PA31 is ahead, 63–33

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 15 · 502 reviews

“I also found last night that this tire in my size (195/65R15) is the OEM tire for the 2009 Honda Civic DX-VP (and probably other configurations and model years close to that).”

Kumho Ecsta PA31
Tire BKumho

Ecsta PA31

All Season Ultra High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 23 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 30

    Dry

    Ecsta PA31 +33
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 5000 SymmetricalEcsta PA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 44 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online1061

    SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical: 60% × 43.7 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 30

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 33

    Wet

    Ecsta PA31 +34
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 5000 SymmetricalEcsta PA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 42 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online1966

    SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical: 60% × 42.2 (est.) + 40% × 19.1 = 33

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 40

    Snow

    Ecsta PA31 +19
    59
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 5000 SymmetricalEcsta PA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 52 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online2152

    SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical: 60% × 52.3 (est.) + 40% × 21.4 = 40

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 59

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 29

    Comfort

    Ecsta PA31 +30
    59
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 5000 SymmetricalEcsta PA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online1055

    SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical: 40% × 58.3 (est.) + 60% × 10 = 29

    Ecsta PA31: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 54.5 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical or Ecsta PA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 5000 SymmetricalEcsta PA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–67

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Ecsta PA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 35

    Treadwear

    Ecsta PA31 +26
    61
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 5000 SymmetricalEcsta PA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 48 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online1558

    SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical: 60% × 48.2 (est.) + 40% × 14.6 = 35

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 5000 SymmetricalEcsta PA31
    Reviews found online–55
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical vs Kumho Ecsta PA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 5000 SymmetricalKumho Ecsta PA31
Relative Score 33 63
Dry 30 63
Wet 33 67
Snow 40 59
Comfort 29 59
Noise – 67
Treadwear 35 61
Handling (owners) – 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical

Ecsta PA31

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Ecsta PA31

Pros

  • Affordable price and high overall value
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong wet-weather grip and confidence

Cons

  • Tendency to develop temporary flat spots when parked for a few days
  • Occasional durability issues such as sidewall bubbles reported by some users
  • Not intended for high-performance track use or extreme grip
All owner themes in the Ecsta PA31 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical

Mixed

Community members generally consider the Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical an acceptable OEM tire with attractive budget pricing when found on sale. While users appreciate its overall performance, ride comfort, and noise levels, concerns are raised regarding rapid treadwear and limited expected mileage.

Top themes
#Affordable pricing#OEM fitment#Poor treadwear#Expected tire lifespan#Ride comfort and noise

Based on 5 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PA31

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical B · Kumho Ecsta PA31
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—7
Rim diameters—15″ – 18″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—500 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical

Kumho Ecsta PA31

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PA31 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PA31 scores 67 vs 33 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PA31 scores 63 vs 30 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PA31 scores 59 vs 29 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PA31 scores 61 vs 35 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PA31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical or Ecsta PA31?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical or Ecsta PA31?

Kumho Ecsta PA31, 67 vs 33 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical or Ecsta PA31?

Kumho Ecsta PA31, 63 vs 30 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical or Ecsta PA31?

Kumho Ecsta PA31, 59 vs 40 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical or Ecsta PA31?

Kumho Ecsta PA31, 59 vs 29 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 5000 Symmetrical or Ecsta PA31?

Kumho Ecsta PA31, 61 vs 35 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology