Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PA31 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Ventus V12 evo2 is ahead, 69–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AKumho

Ecsta PA31

All Season Ultra High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 23 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Ventus V12 evo2 +10
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–73
    Reviews found online5872
  2. 64

    Wet

    Ventus V12 evo2 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–71
    Reviews found online6371
  3. 60

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Reviews found online53–
  4. 62

    Comfort

    Ventus V12 evo2 +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Reviews found online5466
  5. 67

    Noise

    Ventus V12 evo2 +8
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–80
    Reviews found online66–
  6. 60

    Treadwear

    Ventus V12 evo2 +3
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Reviews found online5661
  7. 53

    Handling

    Ventus V12 evo2 +16
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Reviews found online5369
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta PA31 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PA31Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Relative Score 61 69
Dry 62 72
Wet 64 71
Snow 60 –
Comfort 62 68
Noise 67 75
Treadwear 60 63
Handling 53 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta PA31

Ventus V12 evo2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PA31

Pros

  • Affordable price and high overall value
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong wet-weather grip and confidence

Cons

  • Tendency to develop temporary flat spots when parked for a few days
  • Occasional durability issues such as sidewall bubbles reported by some users
  • Not intended for high-performance track use or extreme grip
All owner themes in the Ecsta PA31 review

Tire B Ventus V12 evo2

Pros

  • Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
  • Comfortable ride with low initial road noise

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
  • Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
  • Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
All owner themes in the Ventus V12 evo2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PA31 B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
CategoryAll Season Ultra High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7—
Rim diameters15″ – 18″—
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG500 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PA31

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

Winner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better handling, dry and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 69 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 72 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 75 vs 67 on noise.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 64 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PA31
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

69

Leads

Ventus V12 evo2

Amazon