tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PA31 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 23 + 93 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus V12 evo2 is ahead, 69–63

Check price on Amazon · Ventus V12 evo2 or Ecsta PA31 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PA31
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PA31

All Season Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 23 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Ventus V12 evo2 +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)71
    Reviews found online6171

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Ventus V12 evo2 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)69
    Reviews found online6673

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 59

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online52–

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Ventus V12 evo2 +8
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5566

    Ecsta PA31: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 54.5 = 59

    Ventus V12 evo2: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.6 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PA31 or Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Ventus V12 evo2 +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)78
    Reviews found online67≈ 67 (est.)

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73

    No road tests of noise for Ecsta PA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus V12 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    Level
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5858

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 61

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.4 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 55

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus V12 evo2 +15
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PA31Ventus V12 evo2
    Reviews found online5570
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecsta PA31Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Relative Score 63 69
Dry 63 71
Wet 67 71
Snow 59 –
Comfort 59 67
Noise 67 73
Treadwear 61 61
Handling (owners) 55 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecsta PA31

± 7

Ventus V12 evo2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PA31

Pros

  • Affordable price and high overall value
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong wet-weather grip and confidence

Cons

  • Tendency to develop temporary flat spots when parked for a few days
  • Occasional durability issues such as sidewall bubbles reported by some users
  • Not intended for high-performance track use or extreme grip
All owner themes in the Ecsta PA31 review

Tire B Ventus V12 evo2

Pros

  • Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
  • Comfortable ride with low initial road noise

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
  • Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
  • Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
All owner themes in the Ventus V12 evo2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PA31 B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
CategoryAll Season Ultra High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available738
Rim diameters15″ – 18″15″ – 21″
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG500 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PA31

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

Winner: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 70 vs 55 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 67 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 73 vs 67 on noise.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PA31
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PA31 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PA31 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 71 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PA31 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 71 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ecsta PA31 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 73 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PA31 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 67 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PA31 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 61 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology