Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 1 road tests and 2,189 + 93 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ADVAN Fleva V701 70, Ventus V12 evo2 69.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,189 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 68 · 93 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests | 78 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 71 |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 74
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 71.4 = 71
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests | 70 | 69 |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 73 |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 64 = 68
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 73.2 = 71
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 49 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 13 | – |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 49.1 (est.) + 40% × 12.7 = 35
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 62 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 66 |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.5 + 60% × 61.5 = 62
Ventus V12 evo2: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.6 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 75 | 78 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 60.1 = 69
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus V12 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 75 | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 58 |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 59.4 = 69
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.4 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 70 |
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 71 | – |
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 | Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 69 |
| Dry | 74 | 71 |
| Wet | 68 | 71 |
| Snow | 35 | – |
| Comfort | 62 | 67 |
| Noise | 69 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 70 |
| Efficiency | 71 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ADVAN Fleva V701
Ventus V12 evo2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Ventus V12 evo2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | 97% #4/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 97% #4/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | 88% #4/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 95% #4/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | #4/5 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
Based on 22 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 | B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 70 | 38 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 29 | 29 |
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Too close to call: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 and Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is stronger on treadwear and dry. Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 is stronger on comfort, noise and wet.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 61 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 67 vs 62 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 73 vs 69 on noise.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 71 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 71 vs 68 on our wet score.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 71 on our dry score.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 73 vs 69 on our noise score.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 67 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
