tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus TA31 vs Kumho Ecsta PA31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 78 + 23 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PA31 is ahead, 63–58

Check price on Amazon · Ecsta PA31 or Solus TA31 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA31
Tire AKumho

Solus TA31

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 78 reviews

Kumho Ecsta PA31
Tire BKumho

Ecsta PA31

All Season Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 23 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Ecsta PA31 +6
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Ecsta PA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5161

    Solus TA31: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 57

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 60

    Wet

    Ecsta PA31 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Ecsta PA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5666

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 54

    Snow

    Ecsta PA31 +5
    59
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Ecsta PA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4352

    Solus TA31: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 54

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Solus TA31 +1
    59
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Ecsta PA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5555

    Solus TA31: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 55.1 = 60

    Ecsta PA31: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 54.5 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Solus TA31 or Ecsta PA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    Ecsta PA31 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Ecsta PA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6067

    Solus TA31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 64

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Solus TA31 or Ecsta PA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    Ecsta PA31 +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Ecsta PA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5158

    Solus TA31: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57

    Ecsta PA31: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 50

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PA31 +5
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA31Ecsta PA31
    Reviews found online5055
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Solus TA31Kumho Ecsta PA31
Relative Score 58 63
Dry 57 63
Wet 60 67
Snow 54 59
Comfort 60 59
Noise 64 67
Treadwear 57 61
Handling (owners) 50 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Solus TA31

± 8

Ecsta PA31

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus TA31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Very low road noise and a comfortable, smooth ride
  • Good dry and wet traction for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced high-speed stability and less sharp handling
  • Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, leading to premature replacement
All owner themes in the Solus TA31 review

Tire B Ecsta PA31

Pros

  • Affordable price and high overall value
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong wet-weather grip and confidence

Cons

  • Tendency to develop temporary flat spots when parked for a few days
  • Occasional durability issues such as sidewall bubbles reported by some users
  • Not intended for high-performance track use or extreme grip
All owner themes in the Ecsta PA31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus TA31 B · Kumho Ecsta PA31
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available227
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 18″
Tread depth9.5/32″11/32″
UTQG500 A A500 A A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi50 psi
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus TA31

Kumho Ecsta PA31

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PA31 — better wet, dry and snow. Where the Kumho Solus TA31 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PA31 scores 67 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PA31 scores 63 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Ecsta PA31 scores 59 vs 54 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PA31 scores 61 vs 57 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Solus TA31
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PA31
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus TA31 or Ecsta PA31?

Which is better in the wet, Solus TA31 or Ecsta PA31?

Kumho Ecsta PA31, 67 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus TA31 or Ecsta PA31?

Kumho Ecsta PA31, 63 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Solus TA31 or Ecsta PA31?

Kumho Ecsta PA31, 59 vs 54 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Solus TA31 or Ecsta PA31?

Kumho Ecsta PA31, 67 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Solus TA31 or Ecsta PA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 59 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Solus TA31 or Ecsta PA31?

Kumho Ecsta PA31, 61 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology