Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 726 + 60 owner reviews. How we score

SP Sport FastResponse leads, 72–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    SP Sport FastResponse +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FastResponseBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7571

    SP Sport FastResponse: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 72

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport FastResponse. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    SP Sport FastResponse +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FastResponseBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7673

    SP Sport FastResponse: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport FastResponse. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FastResponseBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7174

    SP Sport FastResponse: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport FastResponse or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 66

    Treadwear

    SP Sport FastResponse +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FastResponseBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6665

    SP Sport FastResponse: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 66

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport FastResponse. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 72

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FastResponseBluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online7273
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport FastResponseYokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 72 70
Dry 72 70
Wet 75 72
Comfort 70 72
Treadwear 66 65
Handling (owners) 72 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport FastResponse

BluEarth Es ES32

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport FastResponse

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • Low road noise and high initial ride comfort
  • Precise steering response and solid dry cornering grip

Cons

  • Faster tread wear reported by some spirited drivers
  • Softer sidewalls can introduce slight flex or floatiness during high-speed maneuvers
  • Road noise can increase noticeably as the tires near the end of their lifespan
All owner themes in the SP Sport FastResponse review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available764
Rim diameters15″ – 17″13″ – 18″
SidewallBlackwall—
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Narrow edge: Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse — better wet. Where the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse scores 75 vs 72 on wet.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport FastResponse or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport FastResponse or BluEarth Es ES32?

Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse, 75 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport FastResponse or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport FastResponse or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport FastResponse or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology