Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 726 reviews
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 726 + 60 owner reviews. How we score
SP Sport FastResponse leads, 72–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
SP Sport FastResponse +270Why this score
Source SP Sport FastResponse BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 75 71 SP Sport FastResponse: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 72
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
No road tests of dry for SP Sport FastResponse. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
75
Wet
SP Sport FastResponse +372Why this score
Source SP Sport FastResponse BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 76 73 SP Sport FastResponse: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72
No road tests of wet for SP Sport FastResponse. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +272Why this score
Source SP Sport FastResponse BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 71 74 SP Sport FastResponse: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport FastResponse or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
SP Sport FastResponse +165Why this score
Source SP Sport FastResponse BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 66 65 SP Sport FastResponse: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 66
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport FastResponse. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
72
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +173Why this score
Source SP Sport FastResponse BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 72 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 70 |
| Dry | 72 | 70 |
| Wet | 75 | 72 |
| Comfort | 70 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
SP Sport FastResponse
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Sport FastResponse
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Low road noise and high initial ride comfort
- Precise steering response and solid dry cornering grip
Cons
- Faster tread wear reported by some spirited drivers
- Softer sidewalls can introduce slight flex or floatiness during high-speed maneuvers
- Road noise can increase noticeably as the tires near the end of their lifespan
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 7 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Sizes in common | 6 | 6 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Narrow edge: Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse — better wet. Where the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse scores 75 vs 72 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Sport FastResponse or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, SP Sport FastResponse or BluEarth Es ES32?
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse, 75 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport FastResponse or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, SP Sport FastResponse or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, SP Sport FastResponse or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology