Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 63 reviews
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 vs Kumho Ecsta KU31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 63 + 165 owner reviews. How we score
SP Sport FM800 is ahead, 76–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 165 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
SP Sport FM800 +867Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 Ecsta KU31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 78 67 SP Sport FM800: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.1 = 75
Ecsta KU31: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
No road tests of dry for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ecsta KU31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
79
Wet
SP Sport FM800 +970Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 Ecsta KU31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 77 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 82 69 SP Sport FM800: 60% × 76.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 79
Ecsta KU31: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70
No road tests of wet for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecsta KU31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Comfort
SP Sport FM800 +865Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 Ecsta KU31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 76 63 SP Sport FM800: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 75.6 = 73
Ecsta KU31: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 63 = 65
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta KU31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
72
Treadwear
SP Sport FM800 +963Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 Ecsta KU31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 76 61 SP Sport FM800: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 72
Ecsta KU31: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta KU31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
SP Sport FM800 +1267Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 Ecsta KU31 Reviews found online 79 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport FM800 | Kumho Ecsta KU31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 67 |
| Dry | 75 | 67 |
| Wet | 79 | 70 |
| Comfort | 73 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
SP Sport FM800
Ecsta KU31
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Sport FM800
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong anti-aquaplaning capabilities
- High value for money compared to premium brands like Michelin and Bridgestone
- Low road noise and very quiet, smooth ride quality
Cons
- Faster than average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Rubber compound can harden over time, leading to reduced performance as the tire ages
- Softer sidewalls can occasionally result in slightly less precise steering feel
Tire B Ecsta KU31
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong dry and wet weather handling
- Progressive and predictable feedback at the limit
Cons
- Increased road noise and potential 'droning' as tread wears
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feel for some drivers
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800 | B · Kumho Ecsta KU31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| UTQG | 320 B A | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Sport FM800
Kumho Ecsta KU31
Winner: Dunlop SP Sport FM800 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 79 vs 67 on handling.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 79 vs 70 on wet.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 72 vs 63 on treadwear.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 75 vs 67 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Sport FM800 or Ecsta KU31?
Which is better in the wet, SP Sport FM800 or Ecsta KU31?
Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 79 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport FM800 or Ecsta KU31?
Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 75 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Sport FM800 or Ecsta KU31?
Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 73 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Sport FM800 or Ecsta KU31?
Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 72 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology