Tests – · none yet Owners 80 · 62 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 62 + 60 owner reviews. How we score
SP Sport FM800 is ahead, 77–71
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
SP Sport FM800 +670Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 81 71 SP Sport FM800: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 76
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70
No road tests of dry for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
80
Wet
SP Sport FM800 +674Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 78 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 84 75 SP Sport FM800: 60% × 77.8 (est.) + 40% × 83.5 = 80
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74
No road tests of wet for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
74
Comfort
SP Sport FM800 +173Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 77 75 SP Sport FM800: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 77 = 74
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 74.7 = 73
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport FM800 or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
SP Sport FM800 +865Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 77 65 SP Sport FM800: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 73
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
80
Handling (owners)
SP Sport FM800 +575Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 80 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport FM800 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 71 |
| Dry | 76 | 70 |
| Wet | 80 | 74 |
| Comfort | 74 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
SP Sport FM800
71
/ 100
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Sport FM800
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong anti-aquaplaning capabilities
- High value for money compared to premium brands like Michelin and Bridgestone
- Low road noise and very quiet, smooth ride quality
Cons
- Faster than average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Rubber compound can harden over time, leading to reduced performance as the tire ages
- Softer sidewalls can occasionally result in slightly less precise steering feel
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Dunlop SP Sport FM800
71
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Dunlop SP Sport FM800 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 73 vs 65 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 76 vs 70 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 80 vs 74 on wet.
Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Sport FM800 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, SP Sport FM800 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 80 vs 74 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport FM800 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 76 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Sport FM800 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, SP Sport FM800 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 73 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology