tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 63 + 63 owner reviews. How we score

SP Sport FM800 leads, 76–72 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · SP Sport FM800 or BluEarth Es ES32 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    SP Sport FM800 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7873

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 74

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 79

    Wet

    SP Sport FM800 +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 77 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online8276

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 76.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 79

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 73

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7676

    SP Sport FM800: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.5 = 73

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  4. 72

    Treadwear

    SP Sport FM800 +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7666

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 72

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 79

    Handling (owners)

    SP Sport FM800 +2
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online7977
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport FM800Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 76 72
Dry 74 71
Wet 79 75
Comfort 73 74
Treadwear 72 66
Handling (owners) 79 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport FM800

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport FM800

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong anti-aquaplaning capabilities
  • High value for money compared to premium brands like Michelin and Bridgestone
  • Low road noise and very quiet, smooth ride quality

Cons

  • Faster than average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Rubber compound can harden over time, leading to reduced performance as the tire ages
  • Softer sidewalls can occasionally result in slightly less precise steering feel
All owner themes in the SP Sport FM800 review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
  • Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
  • Strong value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
  • Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″
UTQG320 B A—

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Narrow edge: Dunlop SP Sport FM800 — better treadwear, wet and dry. Where the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 72 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 79 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 74 vs 71 on dry.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport FM800 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport FM800 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 79 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport FM800 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 74 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport FM800 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport FM800 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 72 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology