Tests – · none yet Owners 80 · 62 reviews
Vredestein Sportrac 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 vs Vredestein Sportrac 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 62 + 60 owner reviews. How we score
SP Sport FM800 leads, 77–75 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
SP Sport FM800 +373Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 Sportrac 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 81 76 SP Sport FM800: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 80.7 = 76
Sportrac 3: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73
No road tests of dry for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Sportrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
80
Wet
Sportrac 3 +181Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 Sportrac 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 78 (est.) ≈ 79 (est.) Reviews found online 84 85 SP Sport FM800: 60% × 77.8 (est.) + 40% × 83.5 = 80
Sportrac 3: 60% × 78.6 (est.) + 40% × 84.9 = 81
No road tests of wet for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Sportrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
74
Comfort
SP Sport FM800 +371Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 Sportrac 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 77 72 SP Sport FM800: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 77 = 74
Sportrac 3: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 72.4 = 71
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport FM800 or Sportrac 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
SP Sport FM800 +667Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 Sportrac 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 77 68 SP Sport FM800: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73
Sportrac 3: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Sportrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
81
Handling (owners)
SP Sport FM800 +576Why this score
Source SP Sport FM800 Sportrac 3 Reviews found online 81 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport FM800 | Vredestein Sportrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 75 |
| Dry | 76 | 73 |
| Wet | 80 | 81 |
| Comfort | 74 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 81 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
SP Sport FM800
Sportrac 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Sport FM800
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong anti-aquaplaning capabilities
- High value for money compared to premium brands like Michelin and Bridgestone
- Low road noise and very quiet, smooth ride quality
Cons
- Faster than average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Rubber compound can harden over time, leading to reduced performance as the tire ages
- Softer sidewalls can occasionally result in slightly less precise steering feel
Tire B Sportrac 3
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
- Predictable and progressive grip characteristics
- Strong steering response and handling feedback
Cons
- Increased road noise, often described as a 'humming' or bearing-like sound
- Rapid tread wear reported by spirited drivers
- Soft sidewall construction which may feel unstable during aggressive cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800 | B · Vredestein Sportrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Sport FM800
Vredestein Sportrac 3
Narrow edge: Dunlop SP Sport FM800 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Where the Vredestein Sportrac 3 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 73 vs 67 on treadwear.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 76 vs 73 on dry.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 74 vs 71 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Sport FM800 or Sportrac 3?
Which is better in the wet, SP Sport FM800 or Sportrac 3?
Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 81 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport FM800 or Sportrac 3?
Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 76 vs 73 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Sport FM800 or Sportrac 3?
Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 74 vs 71 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Sport FM800 or Sportrac 3?
Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 73 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology