Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 301 reviews
“In Hong Kong, if your style is aggresive, sport maxx is not enough, i am using AD08 and RE11 is not bad”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 31 road tests and 301 + 912 owner reviews. How we score
Azenis FK510 is ahead, 74–62
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 301 reviews
“In Hong Kong, if your style is aggresive, sport maxx is not enough, i am using AD08 and RE11 is not bad”
Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 912 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | SP Sport Maxx TT | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 28 tests | ≈ 66 (est.) | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 74 |
SP Sport Maxx TT: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65
Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 74.2 = 73
No road tests of dry for SP Sport Maxx TT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | SP Sport Maxx TT | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 29 tests | ≈ 66 (est.) | 88 |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 78 |
SP Sport Maxx TT: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64
Azenis FK510: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 78 = 84
No road tests of wet for SP Sport Maxx TT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | SP Sport Maxx TT | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 45 |
Azenis FK510: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.9 = 55
No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | SP Sport Maxx TT | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests | ≈ 65 (est.) | 40 |
| Reviews found online | 50 | 67 |
SP Sport Maxx TT: 40% × 64.9 (est.) + 60% × 50.2 = 56
Azenis FK510: 40% × 40.1 + 60% × 66.9 = 56
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport Maxx TT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
| Source | SP Sport Maxx TT | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests | – | 66 |
| Reviews found online | – | 67 |
Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 = 66
| Source | SP Sport Maxx TT | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests | ≈ 61 (est.) | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 50 | 54 |
SP Sport Maxx TT: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 56
Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport Maxx TT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | SP Sport Maxx TT | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 60 | 72 |
| Source | SP Sport Maxx TT | Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests | – | 50 |
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 74 |
| Dry | 65 | 73 |
| Wet | 64 | 84 |
| Snow | – | 55 |
| Comfort | 56 | 56 |
| Noise | – | 66 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
SP Sport Maxx TT
Azenis FK510
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | SP Sport Maxx TT | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/14 2011 Auto Zeitung Max Performance Tyre Test | #7/10 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members generally praise the Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT for its quiet road manners, respectable dry and wet grip, and solid track and cold-weather road performance compared to stock competition-oriented tires. Some drivers note relatively soft sidewalls during aggressive slalom events on heavier vehicles or limited grip before coming up to temperature. Overall, drivers find it to be a capable, comfortable summer tire that balances performance and daily drivability.
“Not on a gta but my 993 in 265 35 18 rears 225 40 18 fronts - noisy and not much grip at normal driving speeds. On a good cross country blast or track very good Not as bad in the wet as people make out. I also had a set on my Chevette hsr for road use - not bad to be honest but are getting quite expensive. Pondering on getting a set for my 75 but I think a set of part worn Michelins may be a cheaper bet for the limited use it gets (need to get it rolling roaded at alfatuner first when the weather gets a bit better)”
“After 3 sessions of autoslalom, I can say that the sidewall is too soft for this heavy car. I have the front tires set at 39 psi cool. I may try higher pressure next time to see if it can reduce the tire roll and maintain traction. In term of day to day driving, this is a great quiet summer tire. It performs well in wet too.”
“We have these tires on my 18 Grand Sport and my wife’s 17 Z51 Convertible driving in Ohio. Very pleased with these tires! Probably should be OEM for these cars. Handle very well. Doesn’t throw gravel up on the cars like stock tires. Cold weather grip is very good! Stock MPSS are scary below 50 degrees. We have had good success with Discount Tire for purchase and install.”
Based on 19 community posts
Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.
“I've had a set of Falken Azenis FK510's on my car for a couple of months now, and just this past weekend took a trip through the twisties up to Prescott, and pushed the car as hard as I could heading up the mountain. I was a little nervous as I'd never used Falken tires before, but trusted in Tire Rack's reviews of them and pushed the envelope in every turn I hit. It was a pleasant surprise to find that the tires were gripping just as well as the much more expensive Michelin tires they'd replaced, and I even hit a personal best of .95g going around one of the more nasty turns. During this entire drive I never felt once like the tires weren't gripping perfectly, or that I was going to lose control from them breaking loose. Road noise is pretty much non-existent, and they seem to run pretty smooth over every surface I've driven them on so far. All-in-all I don't regret my purchase one bit, and if their longevity is anything like what I got out of my previous set of Michelins I'll definitely be buying another set once this one is done for.”
“Falken Azenis FK510 prices? Anyone know why the prices for Falken Azenis FK510's went up 25% or more in the last month? 235/40R18 went from $154 to $192. The whole benefit of these tires is that they offer PS4S performance for way less money. Now, you midaswhale just buy the Michelins. I haven't seen any other summer tires make that kind of a jump in price. I know Falken announced a price increase for 2022, but it was only like 5%. What's the dealio? Read more”
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
Based on 63 community posts
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 5 | 93 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 AA A | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT
Falken Azenis FK510
Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 84 vs 64 on wet.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 72 vs 60 on handling.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 66 vs 56 on treadwear.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 73 vs 65 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Falken Azenis FK510, 84 vs 64 on our wet score.
Falken Azenis FK510, 73 vs 65 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 56 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Falken Azenis FK510, 66 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology