Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 31 road tests and 301 + 912 owner reviews. How we score

Azenis FK510 is ahead, 74–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport Maxx TT

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 301 reviews

“In Hong Kong, if your style is aggresive, sport maxx is not enough, i am using AD08 and RE11 is not bad”

Falken Azenis FK510
Tire BFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

± 4

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 912 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Azenis FK510 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport Maxx TTAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 28 tests≈ 66 (est.)73
    Reviews found online6374

    SP Sport Maxx TT: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 74.2 = 73

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport Maxx TT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +20
    84
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport Maxx TTAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 29 tests≈ 66 (est.)88
    Reviews found online6278

    SP Sport Maxx TT: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 78 = 84

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport Maxx TT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport Maxx TTAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online–45

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.9 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 56

    Comfort

    Level
    56
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport Maxx TTAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 65 (est.)40
    Reviews found online5067

    SP Sport Maxx TT: 40% × 64.9 (est.) + 60% × 50.2 = 56

    Azenis FK510: 40% × 40.1 + 60% × 66.9 = 56

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport Maxx TT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport Maxx TTAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests–66
    Reviews found online–67

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 = 66

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Azenis FK510 +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport Maxx TTAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 61 (est.)73
    Reviews found online5054

    SP Sport Maxx TT: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 56

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport Maxx TT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 60

    Handling (owners)

    Azenis FK510 +12
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport Maxx TTAzenis FK510
    Reviews found online6072
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport Maxx TTAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests–50
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT vs Falken Azenis FK510: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport Maxx TTFalken Azenis FK510
Relative Score 62 74
Dry 65 73
Wet 64 84
Snow – 55
Comfort 56 56
Noise – 66
Treadwear 56 66
Handling (owners) 60 72
Efficiency – 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport Maxx TT

± 4

Azenis FK510

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategorySP Sport Maxx TTAzenis FK510ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/14 2011 Auto Zeitung Max Performance Tyre Test #7/10 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport Maxx TT

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and precise cornering stability
  • Stiff sidewalls providing sharp steering feedback and confidence
  • Better-than-average tread life and mileage for many everyday drivers

Cons

  • High levels of road noise and cabin hum at speeds above 50 mph
  • Stiff, harsh ride quality, particularly with run-flat variants
  • Inconsistent or poor grip in wet, damp, or cold weather conditions
All owner themes in the SP Sport Maxx TT review

Tire B Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT

Positive

Community members generally praise the Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT for its quiet road manners, respectable dry and wet grip, and solid track and cold-weather road performance compared to stock competition-oriented tires. Some drivers note relatively soft sidewalls during aggressive slalom events on heavier vehicles or limited grip before coming up to temperature. Overall, drivers find it to be a capable, comfortable summer tire that balances performance and daily drivability.

Top themes
#quiet ride quality#track and slalom handling#wet and dry traction#cold weather performance#sidewall stiffness concerns#replacement for OEM tires

Based on 19 community posts

Tire B

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

corvetteforum.com

“I've had a set of Falken Azenis FK510's on my car for a couple of months now, and just this past weekend took a trip through the twisties up to Prescott, and pushed the car as hard as I could heading up the mountain. I was a little nervous as I'd never used Falken tires before, but trusted in Tire Rack's reviews of them and pushed the envelope in every turn I hit. It was a pleasant surprise to find that the tires were gripping just as well as the much more expensive Michelin tires they'd replaced, and I even hit a personal best of .95g going around one of the more nasty turns. During this entire drive I never felt once like the tires weren't gripping perfectly, or that I was going to lose control from them breaking loose. Road noise is pretty much non-existent, and they seem to run pretty smooth over every surface I've driven them on so far. All-in-all I don't regret my purchase one bit, and if their longevity is anything like what I got out of my previous set of Michelins I'll definitely be buying another set once this one is done for.”

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2022-02-08

“Falken Azenis FK510 prices? Anyone know why the prices for Falken Azenis FK510's went up 25% or more in the last month? 235/40R18 went from $154 to $192. The whole benefit of these tires is that they offer PS4S performance for way less money. Now, you midaswhale just buy the Michelins. I haven't seen any other summer tires make that kind of a jump in price. I know Falken announced a price increase for 2022, but it was only like 5%. What's the dealio? Read more”

r/TeslaModel3 ·1 upvote ·2024-02-10

“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”

Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT B · Falken Azenis FK510
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available593
Rim diameters16″ – 18″17″ – 22″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG240 AA A300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT

Falken Azenis FK510

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 84 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 72 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 66 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 73 vs 65 on dry.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport Maxx TT or Azenis FK510?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport Maxx TT or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 84 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport Maxx TT or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 73 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport Maxx TT or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 56 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport Maxx TT or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 66 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology