Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 22 reviews
Dunlop SP Touring R1 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 22 + 1,595 owner reviews. How we score
SP Touring R1 is ahead, 70–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 50 · 1,595 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
SP Touring R1 +663Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 70 50 SP Touring R1: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69
Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 49.5 = 63
No road tests of dry for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
SP Touring R1 +566Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 71 53 SP Touring R1: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71
Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 53.4 = 66
No road tests of wet for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Comfort
SP Touring R1 +1453Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 66 45 SP Touring R1: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.8 = 67
Kinergy Eco 2: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.3 = 53
No road tests of comfort for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison71Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 75 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy Eco 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
69
Treadwear
SP Touring R1 +1455Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 71 48 SP Touring R1: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 69
Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
72
Handling (owners)
SP Touring R1 +2349Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Kinergy Eco 2 Reviews found online 72 49 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison75Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Kinergy Eco 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Touring R1 | Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 60 |
| Dry | 69 | 63 |
| Wet | 71 | 66 |
| Comfort | 67 | 53 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 49 |
| Efficiency | – | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
SP Touring R1
Kinergy Eco 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Touring R1
Pros
- High tread longevity and durability
- Excellent value for money
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability
- Occasional road noise feedback
Tire B Kinergy Eco 2
Pros
- Reliable dry and wet road grip
- Good value for the price point
- Slow and even tread wear / long-lasting durability
Cons
- Notable road noise reported by some users
- Stiff ride quality that can amplify road bumps
- Reduced performance and grip in wet or cold conditions as tread wears down
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Touring R1 | B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 48 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 17″ |
| UTQG | 400 B B | 200 - 400 A - B A |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Touring R1
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Winner: Dunlop SP Touring R1 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 72 vs 49 on handling.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 67 vs 53 on comfort.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 69 vs 55 on treadwear.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 69 vs 63 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Touring R1 or Kinergy Eco 2?
Which is better in the wet, SP Touring R1 or Kinergy Eco 2?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 71 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Touring R1 or Kinergy Eco 2?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 69 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Touring R1 or Kinergy Eco 2?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 67 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Touring R1 or Kinergy Eco 2?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 69 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology