Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 45 reviews
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D vs Kumho Ecsta PA31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 45 + 23 owner reviews. How we score
SP Winter Sport 3D leads, 67–63 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 23 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Level63Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 3D Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 60 60 SP Winter Sport 3D: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 63
Ecsta PA31: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 63
No road tests of dry for SP Winter Sport 3D. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
SP Winter Sport 3D +667Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 3D Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 74 66 SP Winter Sport 3D: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 73
Ecsta PA31: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 67
No road tests of wet for SP Winter Sport 3D. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
SP Winter Sport 3D +1159Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 3D Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 69 51 SP Winter Sport 3D: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 70
Ecsta PA31: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 59
No road tests of snow for SP Winter Sport 3D. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
64
Comfort
SP Winter Sport 3D +658Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 3D Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 61 54 SP Winter Sport 3D: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 61.1 = 64
Ecsta PA31: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.6 = 58
No road tests of comfort for SP Winter Sport 3D. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
63
Noise
Ecsta PA31 +467Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 3D Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 58 67 SP Winter Sport 3D: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 63
Ecsta PA31: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 67
No road tests of noise for SP Winter Sport 3D or Ecsta PA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
SP Winter Sport 3D +161Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 3D Ecsta PA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 60 58 SP Winter Sport 3D: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 62
Ecsta PA31: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for SP Winter Sport 3D. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
67
Handling (owners)
SP Winter Sport 3D +1255Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 3D Ecsta PA31 Reviews found online 67 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D | Kumho Ecsta PA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 63 |
| Dry | 63 | 63 |
| Wet | 73 | 67 |
| Snow | 70 | 59 |
| Comfort | 64 | 58 |
| Noise | 63 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
SP Winter Sport 3D
Ecsta PA31
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Winter Sport 3D
Pros
- Outstanding grip and traction in deep and packed snow
- Confident handling and braking performance on cold, wet roads
- Great dry-road handling and steering response during winter temperatures
Cons
- High and sometimes unbearable road noise as the tires age
- Degradation of grip and hardening of rubber compound over multiple seasons
- Faster or below-average tread life reported by some drivers
Tire B Ecsta PA31
Pros
- Affordable price and high overall value
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Strong wet-weather grip and confidence
Cons
- Tendency to develop temporary flat spots when parked for a few days
- Occasional durability issues such as sidewall bubbles reported by some users
- Not intended for high-performance track use or extreme grip
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D | B · Kumho Ecsta PA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 21 | 7 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D
Kumho Ecsta PA31
Narrow edge: Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D — better handling, snow and wet. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PA31 if noise matters most to you.
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D scores 67 vs 55 on handling.
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D scores 70 vs 59 on snow.
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D scores 73 vs 67 on wet.
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D scores 64 vs 58 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Winter Sport 3D or Ecsta PA31?
Which is better in the wet, SP Winter Sport 3D or Ecsta PA31?
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D, 73 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Winter Sport 3D or Ecsta PA31?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, SP Winter Sport 3D or Ecsta PA31?
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D, 70 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, SP Winter Sport 3D or Ecsta PA31?
Kumho Ecsta PA31, 67 vs 63 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Winter Sport 3D or Ecsta PA31?
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D, 64 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Winter Sport 3D or Ecsta PA31?
Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 61 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology