Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 38 reviews
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D vs Hankook Winter i cept evo2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 38 + 28 owner reviews. How we score
SP Winter Sport 4D is ahead, 78–70
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 5 tests Owners 71 · 28 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
79
Dry
SP Winter Sport 4D +1267Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 4D Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 84 71 SP Winter Sport 4D: 60% × 74.8 (est.) + 40% × 84.1 = 79
Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 71.3 = 67
No road tests of dry for SP Winter Sport 4D. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
84
Wet
SP Winter Sport 4D +1371Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 4D Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 81 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 89 74 SP Winter Sport 4D: 60% × 81 (est.) + 40% × 89.2 = 84
Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 73.5 = 71
No road tests of wet for SP Winter Sport 4D. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Snow
SP Winter Sport 4D +170Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 4D Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 71 66 SP Winter Sport 4D: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71
Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 72 + 40% × 66.4 = 70
No road tests of snow for SP Winter Sport 4D. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
80
Comfort
SP Winter Sport 4D +1070Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 4D Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 85 71 SP Winter Sport 4D: 40% × 72.1 (est.) + 60% × 85 = 80
Winter i cept evo2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70
No road tests of comfort for SP Winter Sport 4D or Winter i cept evo2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison55Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 4D Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 47 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 47.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 55
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
76
Treadwear
SP Winter Sport 4D +769Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 4D Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 82 73 SP Winter Sport 4D: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 76
Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 72.6 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for SP Winter Sport 4D. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
85
Handling (owners)
SP Winter Sport 4D +1273Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 4D Winter i cept evo2 Reviews found online 85 73 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison59Why this score
Source SP Winter Sport 4D Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D | Hankook Winter i cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 70 |
| Dry | 79 | 67 |
| Wet | 84 | 71 |
| Snow | 71 | 70 |
| Comfort | 80 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 55 |
| Treadwear | 76 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | 73 |
| Efficiency | – | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
SP Winter Sport 4D
Winter i cept evo2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | SP Winter Sport 4D | Winter i cept evo2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/48 2014 50 Winter Tyre Braking Overview | #5/11 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Winter Sport 4D
Pros
- Exceptional grip and stability in wet, slushy, and cold dry conditions.
- Remarkably low road noise, often quieter than summer tire counterparts.
- High level of ride comfort and refined road manners.
Cons
- Noticeable 'squirm' or lack of sharpness during high-speed cornering.
- Occasional reports of understeer in specific wet or icy conditions.
- Some users noted a 'hard' ride quality compared to previous iterations like the 3D.
Tire B Winter i cept evo2
Pros
- Impressive grip and traction on snow and ice
- High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
- Good value for money compared to higher-priced premium alternatives
Cons
- Soft sidewalls or goofy feel on dry roads, particularly in warmer winter temperatures
- Performance and grip degrade significantly as the tire ages over multiple seasons
- Can struggle to put down high torque/power on rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D | B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 20 | 79 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Sizes in common | 14 | 14 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Winner: Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D scores 84 vs 71 on wet.
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D scores 79 vs 67 on dry.
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D scores 85 vs 73 on handling.
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D scores 80 vs 70 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Winter Sport 4D or Winter i cept evo2?
Which is better in the wet, SP Winter Sport 4D or Winter i cept evo2?
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D, 84 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Winter Sport 4D or Winter i cept evo2?
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D, 79 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, SP Winter Sport 4D or Winter i cept evo2?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, SP Winter Sport 4D or Winter i cept evo2?
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D, 80 vs 70 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Winter Sport 4D or Winter i cept evo2?
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 4D, 76 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology