tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 5 road tests and 21 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Blizzak WS90 68, Winter i cept evo2 69.

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak WS90 Check price on Amazon · Winter i cept evo2
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Tire BHankook

Winter i cept evo2

Winter

± 7

Tests 67 · 5 tests Owners 71 · 28 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Blizzak WS90 +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests8565
    Reviews found online5571

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 85 + 40% × 55.1 = 73

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 71.3 = 67

  2. 67

    Wet

    Winter i cept evo2 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests6570
    Reviews found online6974

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 69 = 67

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 73.5 = 71

  3. 73

    Snow

    Blizzak WS90 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests6972
    Reviews found online7966

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 69.1 + 40% × 79.2 = 73

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 72 + 40% × 66.4 = 70

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Winter i cept evo2 +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests68≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5671

    Blizzak WS90: 40% × 68.5 + 60% × 56 = 61

    Winter i cept evo2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Winter i cept evo2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 63

    Noise

    Blizzak WS90 +8
    55
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7047
    Reviews found online52≈ 67 (est.)

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 70.5 + 40% × 51.7 = 63

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 47.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 55

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    Winter i cept evo2 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 63 (est.)67
    Reviews found online5873

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61

    Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 72.6 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Winter i cept evo2 +11
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter i cept evo2
    Reviews found online6273
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    59
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter i cept evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–59
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak WS90Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Relative Score 68 69
Dry 73 67
Wet 67 71
Snow 73 70
Comfort 61 70
Noise 63 55
Treadwear 61 69
Handling (owners) 62 73
Efficiency – 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blizzak WS90

± 7

Winter i cept evo2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak WS90Winter i cept evo2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 90% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 91% #11/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 79% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 96% #3/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 70% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 97% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 85% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 99% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/10 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test #5/11 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak WS90

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
  • Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
  • Strong capability in slush and deep snow

Cons

  • Increased road noise during highway driving
  • Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
  • Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
All owner themes in the Blizzak WS90 review

Tire B Winter i cept evo2

Pros

  • Impressive grip and traction on snow and ice
  • High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Good value for money compared to higher-priced premium alternatives

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls or goofy feel on dry roads, particularly in warmer winter temperatures
  • Performance and grip degrade significantly as the tire ages over multiple seasons
  • Can struggle to put down high torque/power on rear-wheel-drive vehicles
All owner themes in the Winter i cept evo2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4579
Rim diameters15″ – 19″15″ – 22″
Tread depth11/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common2828

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

Hankook Winter i cept evo2

Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 and Hankook Winter i cept evo2 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 is stronger on noise, dry and snow. Hankook Winter i cept evo2 is stronger on handling, comfort and treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 73 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 70 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 63 vs 55 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 scores 69 vs 61 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2, 71 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 70 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 63 vs 55 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2, 70 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak WS90 or Winter i cept evo2?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2, 69 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology