Dunlop SP2000 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP2000 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 14 + 1,595 owner reviews. How we score

Kinergy Eco 2 leads, 60–57 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP2000
Tire ADunlop

SP2000

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 14 reviews

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire BHankook

Kinergy Eco 2

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 50 · 1,595 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    Kinergy Eco 2 +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSP2000Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 62 (est.)72
    Reviews found online5250

    SP2000: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 52.4 = 58

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 49.5 = 63

    No road tests of dry for SP2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 61

    Wet

    Kinergy Eco 2 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP2000Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 63 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5753

    SP2000: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 56.8 = 61

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 53.4 = 66

    No road tests of wet for SP2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Comfort

    Level
    53
    Why this score
    SourceSP2000Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4545

    SP2000: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.4 = 53

    Kinergy Eco 2: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.3 = 53

    No road tests of comfort for SP2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSP2000Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–75
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy Eco 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 52

    Treadwear

    Kinergy Eco 2 +3
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSP2000Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4248

    SP2000: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 52

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for SP2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 48

    Handling (owners)

    Kinergy Eco 2 +1
    49
    Why this score
    SourceSP2000Kinergy Eco 2
    Reviews found online4849
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSP2000Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–75
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP2000 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP2000Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Relative Score 57 60
Dry 58 63
Wet 61 66
Comfort 53 53
Noise – 71
Treadwear 52 55
Handling (owners) 48 49
Efficiency – 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP2000

± 6

Kinergy Eco 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP2000

Pros

  • Strong hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
  • Predictable and consistent grip in dry conditions
  • Competitive pricing compared to premium alternatives

Cons

  • High levels of intrusive road noise and droning
  • Rapid and inconsistent tread wear
  • Noticeable tendency toward understeer when pushed
All owner themes in the SP2000 review

Tire B Kinergy Eco 2

Pros

  • Reliable dry and wet road grip
  • Good value for the price point
  • Slow and even tread wear / long-lasting durability

Cons

  • Notable road noise reported by some users
  • Stiff ride quality that can amplify road bumps
  • Reduced performance and grip in wet or cold conditions as tread wears down
All owner themes in the Kinergy Eco 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP2000 B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—48
Rim diameters—13″ – 17″
UTQG—200 - 400 A - B A

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP2000

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

Narrow edge: Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP2000 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 63 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 66 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 55 vs 52 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop SP2000
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP2000 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Which is better in the wet, SP2000 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 66 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP2000 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 63 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP2000 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 53 vs 53 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, SP2000 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 55 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology