Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 14 reviews
Dunlop SP2000 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Dunlop SP2000 vs Yokohama Advan dB V552 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 37 owner reviews. How we score
Advan dB V552 leads, 60–57 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 37 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
Advan dB V552 +159Why this score
Source SP2000 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 52 54 SP2000: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 52.4 = 58
Advan dB V552: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 59
No road tests of dry for SP2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
61
Wet
Advan dB V552 +263Why this score
Source SP2000 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 57 60 SP2000: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 56.8 = 61
Advan dB V552: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 63
No road tests of wet for SP2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Comfort
Advan dB V552 +1265Why this score
Source SP2000 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 45 64 SP2000: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.4 = 53
Advan dB V552: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.7 = 65
No road tests of comfort for SP2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
52
Treadwear
Advan dB V552 +557Why this score
Source SP2000 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 42 52 SP2000: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 52
Advan dB V552: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for SP2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
48
Handling (owners)
Advan dB V552 +957Why this score
Source SP2000 Advan dB V552 Reviews found online 48 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP2000 | Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 60 |
| Dry | 58 | 59 |
| Wet | 61 | 63 |
| Comfort | 53 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 48 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
SP2000
Advan dB V552
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP2000
Pros
- Strong hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
- Predictable and consistent grip in dry conditions
- Competitive pricing compared to premium alternatives
Cons
- High levels of intrusive road noise and droning
- Rapid and inconsistent tread wear
- Noticeable tendency toward understeer when pushed
Tire B Advan dB V552
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and silent operation at various speeds
- High level of ride comfort, effectively absorbing bumps and potholes
- Good grip and sure-footed performance in wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can cause a floating sensation or lack of sharpness at higher speeds
- Reduced dry cornering grip when pushed hard, with some tendency to wash out
- Mixed feedback on overall durability, with a few users experiencing faster-than-expected wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP2000 | B · Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 45 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP2000
Yokohama Advan dB V552
Narrow edge: Yokohama Advan dB V552 — better comfort, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP2000 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 65 vs 53 on comfort.
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 57 vs 48 on handling.
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 57 vs 52 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP2000 or Advan dB V552?
Which is better in the wet, SP2000 or Advan dB V552?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 63 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP2000 or Advan dB V552?
Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 59 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, SP2000 or Advan dB V552?
Yokohama Advan dB V552, 65 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP2000 or Advan dB V552?
Yokohama Advan dB V552, 57 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology