Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop Sport BluResponse vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 10 + 13 road tests and 5,210 + 2,504 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 75–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop Sport BluResponse
Tire ADunlop

Sport BluResponse

Summer

± 6

Tests 70 · 10 tests Owners 68 · 5,210 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (comfort (tester's mark))

“Consider Dunlop Sport Blu Response, I am on my second set with the MB and find them to be excellent with high grip in the dry or wet, quiet and have lasted longer than other premium brands.”

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire BHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 78 · 13 tests Owners 71 · 2,504 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 4 tests that measured dry braking for both, Sport BluResponse won 0 and Ventus Prime 4 won 4 (average 94% vs 98% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured wet braking for both, Sport BluResponse won 0 and Ventus Prime 4 won 4 (average 84% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Sport BluResponse won 3 and Ventus Prime 4 won 0 (average 96% vs 92% of the best).
  1. 77

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 4 +3
    80
    Why this score
    SourceSport BluResponseVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 11 tests7884
    Reviews found online7673
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 0–494%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–199%99%

    Sport BluResponse: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 75.8 = 77

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 73.4 = 80

  2. 76

    Wet

    Ventus Prime 4 +2
    78
    Why this score
    SourceSport BluResponseVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 12 tests7581
    Reviews found online7875
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–093%86%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–096%92%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 0–484%93%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–188%99%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–296%97%

    Sport BluResponse: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 77.5 = 76

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 74.6 = 78

  3. 75

    Comfort

    Sport BluResponse +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSport BluResponseVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests8070
    Reviews found online7268

    Sport BluResponse: 40% × 80.2 + 60% × 72.2 = 75

    Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.8 = 69

  4. 60

    Noise

    Ventus Prime 4 +1
    61
    Why this score
    SourceSport BluResponseVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 8 tests5658
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–298%99%

    Sport BluResponse: 60% × 55.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 60

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for Sport BluResponse or Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 55

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime 4 +19
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSport BluResponseVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 5 tests5978
    Reviews found online5067
    Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–143%52%
    Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–156%59%

    Sport BluResponse: 60% × 58.8 + 40% × 49.8 = 55

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 66.7 = 74

  6. 70

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 4 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSport BluResponseVentus Prime 4
    Reviews found online7072
  7. 87

    Efficiency

    Sport BluResponse +4
    83
    Why this score
    SourceSport BluResponseVentus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 8 tests8783
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%95%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–095%90%
Scores at a glance
Dunlop Sport BluResponse vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop Sport BluResponseHankook Ventus Prime 4
Relative Score 69 75
Dry 77 80
Wet 76 78
Comfort 75 69
Noise 60 61
Treadwear 55 74
Handling (owners) 70 72
Efficiency 87 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Sport BluResponse

± 4

Ventus Prime 4

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Dunlop Sport BluResponse finished ahead 0 times and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 4 times.

DisciplineCategorySport BluResponseVentus Prime 4ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 94% 98% −4.1 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling Dry 99% 99% −0.2 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 93% 86% +7.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% 92% +4.0 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 84% 93% −9.9 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 88% 99% −11.6 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling Wet 96% 97% −1.0 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Noise Noise 98% 99% −0.8 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Abrasion Treadwear 43% 52% −8.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wear Treadwear 56% 59% −2.2 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 97% 95% +1.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 95% 90% +5.0 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 95% 96% −1.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #6/20 #4/20 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Value Cost 48% 57% −9.5 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #20/55 #4/55 – 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Sport BluResponse

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Noticeable improvement in fuel economy/low rolling resistance

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some drivers, particularly on front drive axles
  • Soft sidewalls can cause a slightly spongy feel or tire flex during aggressive cornering
  • Poor performance and loss of traction in snow and freezing temperatures
All owner themes in the Sport BluResponse review

Tire B Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Dunlop Sport BluResponse

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Dunlop Sport BluResponse is consistently positive, with users praising its grip in both dry and wet conditions, longevity, and quiet ride. It is frequently regarded as a well-rounded and reasonably priced tire with attractive specifications, though some users note limited availability in certain regions like the US.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Low tyre noise#Tread longevity#Reasonable pricing#Low rolling resistance#Market availability

Based on 6 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

teslamotorsclub.com ·2023-09-01

“MOT coming up on the 29th and the rear tyres won't make it. Front tyres have a bit of wear left but I'm wondering if I should do all four now or the rears now and then the fronts sometime in about 6 months or so. Better deals on 4 tyres though ... but then I'd be throwing away 2 decent tyres with some use still in them so ... Also, looking on KiwkFit... any reason why I wouldn't go for the Ventus Prime 4s over the Michelins?”

r/CartalkHungary ·2 upvotes ·2024-09-20

“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”

r/TyreReviews ·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16

“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”

Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop Sport BluResponse B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available2866
Rim diameters14″ – 17″15″ – 20″
Sizes in common1717

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop Sport BluResponse

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better treadwear and dry. Pick the Dunlop Sport BluResponse if comfort and efficiency matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop Sport BluResponse scores 75 vs 69 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Dunlop Sport BluResponse scores 87 vs 83 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 80 vs 77 on dry.

Tire A · Dunlop Sport BluResponse
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Sport BluResponse or Ventus Prime 4?

Which is better in the wet, Sport BluResponse or Ventus Prime 4?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Sport BluResponse or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 80 vs 77 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Sport BluResponse or Ventus Prime 4?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 61 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Sport BluResponse or Ventus Prime 4?

Dunlop Sport BluResponse, 75 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Sport BluResponse or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Sport BluResponse or Ventus Prime 4?

Dunlop Sport BluResponse, 87 vs 83 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology