Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 195 reviews
Dunlop Sport Maxx RT vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 31 road tests and 195 + 910 owner reviews. How we score
Azenis FK510 is ahead, 70–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 910 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Azenis FK510 +673Why this score
Source Sport Maxx RT Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 28 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 67 74 Sport Maxx RT: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 74.2 = 73
No road tests of dry for Sport Maxx RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
69
Wet
Azenis FK510 +1584Why this score
Source Sport Maxx RT Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 29 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 69 78 Sport Maxx RT: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
Azenis FK510: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 77.9 = 84
No road tests of wet for Sport Maxx RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Snow
Level55Why this score
Source Sport Maxx RT Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 45 45 Sport Maxx RT: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 55
Azenis FK510: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 55
No road tests of snow for Sport Maxx RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
Sport Maxx RT +656Why this score
Source Sport Maxx RT Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 40 Reviews found online 59 67 Sport Maxx RT: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.5 = 62
Azenis FK510: 40% × 40.3 + 60% × 66.9 = 56
No road tests of comfort for Sport Maxx RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
66
Noise
Level66Why this score
Source Sport Maxx RT Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 65 67 Sport Maxx RT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66
Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.9 = 66
No road tests of noise for Sport Maxx RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
53
Treadwear
Azenis FK510 +1366Why this score
Source Sport Maxx RT Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 44 54 Sport Maxx RT: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.1 = 53
Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Sport Maxx RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
66
Handling (owners)
Azenis FK510 +672Why this score
Source Sport Maxx RT Azenis FK510 Reviews found online 66 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison50Why this score
Source Sport Maxx RT Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests – 50
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop Sport Maxx RT | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 70 |
| Dry | 67 | 73 |
| Wet | 69 | 84 |
| Snow | 55 | 55 |
| Comfort | 62 | 56 |
| Noise | 66 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Sport Maxx RT
Azenis FK510
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Sport Maxx RT | Azenis FK510 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/14 2015 AZ 225/40 R18 Summer Tyre Test | #7/10 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Sport Maxx RT
Pros
- Outstanding grip and traction in both dry and wet conditions
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable and progressive handling at limits
Cons
- Fast tread wear leading to short tire lifespan
- Prone to developing cracks in the tread blocks or sidewalls prematurely
- Subpar performance in freezing temperatures, snow, or slush
Tire B Azenis FK510
Pros
- Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
- Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Dunlop Sport Maxx RT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Falken Azenis FK510
Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
“Falken Azenis FK510 prices? Anyone know why the prices for Falken Azenis FK510's went up 25% or more in the last month? 235/40R18 went from $154 to $192. The whole benefit of these tires is that they offer PS4S performance for way less money. Now, you midaswhale just buy the Michelins. I haven't seen any other summer tires make that kind of a jump in price. I know Falken announced a price increase for 2022, but it was only like 5%. What's the dealio? Read more”
“I've had a set of Falken Azenis FK510's on my car for a couple of months now, and just this past weekend took a trip through the twisties up to Prescott, and pushed the car as hard as I could heading up the mountain. I was a little nervous as I'd never used Falken tires before, but trusted in Tire Rack's reviews of them and pushed the envelope in every turn I hit. It was a pleasant surprise to find that the tires were gripping just as well as the much more expensive Michelin tires they'd replaced, and I even hit a personal best of .95g going around one of the more nasty turns. During this entire drive I never felt once like the tires weren't gripping perfectly, or that I was going to lose control from them breaking loose. Road noise is pretty much non-existent, and they seem to run pretty smooth over every surface I've driven them on so far. All-in-all I don't regret my purchase one bit, and if their longevity is anything like what I got out of my previous set of Michelins I'll definitely be buying another set once this one is done for.”
Based on 63 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop Sport Maxx RT | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 27 | 93 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 A A | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 18 | 18 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop Sport Maxx RT
Falken Azenis FK510
Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, treadwear and dry. Pick the Dunlop Sport Maxx RT if comfort matters most to you.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 84 vs 69 on wet.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 66 vs 53 on treadwear.
Dunlop Sport Maxx RT scores 62 vs 56 on comfort.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Sport Maxx RT or Azenis FK510?
Which is better in the wet, Sport Maxx RT or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 84 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Sport Maxx RT or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Sport Maxx RT or Azenis FK510?
Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 55 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Sport Maxx RT or Azenis FK510?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Sport Maxx RT or Azenis FK510?
Dunlop Sport Maxx RT, 62 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Sport Maxx RT or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 66 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology