Tests 75 · 25 tests Owners 78 · 44 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 25 + 5 road tests and 44 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Winter Sport 5 and UltraGrip 9+ are level at 76.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 25 tests Owners 78 · 44 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)
Tests 75 · 5 tests Owners 79 · 6 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test (ice braking)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Winter Sport 5 | UltraGrip 9+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 4 tests | 66 | 60 |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 79 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 | 94% | 94% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 98% | 98% |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 70% | 80% |
Winter Sport 5: 60% × 66.1 + 40% × 73.3 = 69
UltraGrip 9+: 60% × 60.1 + 40% × 79.3 = 68
| Source | Winter Sport 5 | UltraGrip 9+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / 5 tests | 86 | 87 |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 83 |
| Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 92% | 97% |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 | 90% | 97% |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 50% | 50% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 2–2 | 94% | 92% |
| Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 92% | 91% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 98% |
Winter Sport 5: 60% × 86.5 + 40% × 81.1 = 84
UltraGrip 9+: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 83.3 = 85
| Source | Winter Sport 5 | UltraGrip 9+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / 5 tests | 87 | 85 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 74 |
| Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 95% | 100% |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 3–1 | 100% | 99% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 98% | 97% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 | 98% | 98% |
| Snow Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 80% | 90% |
Winter Sport 5: 60% × 86.7 + 40% × 78.3 = 83
UltraGrip 9+: 60% × 84.7 + 40% × 74.1 = 80
| Source | Winter Sport 5 | UltraGrip 9+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 75 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 75 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 90% | 100% |
Winter Sport 5: 40% × 75.2 + 60% × 76.5 = 76
UltraGrip 9+: 40% × 76.8 + 60% × 74.7 = 76
| Source | Winter Sport 5 | UltraGrip 9+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 3 tests | 11 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 97% | 98% |
Winter Sport 5: 60% × 10.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 33
UltraGrip 9+: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for Winter Sport 5 or UltraGrip 9+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Winter Sport 5 | UltraGrip 9+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 2 tests | 78 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 81 |
| Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 74% | 69% |
| Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 76% | 79% |
Winter Sport 5: 60% × 77.9 + 40% × 79.3 = 78
UltraGrip 9+: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 81.3 = 75
| Source | Winter Sport 5 | UltraGrip 9+ |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 74 |
| Source | Winter Sport 5 | UltraGrip 9+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 4 tests | 79 | 78 |
| Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 97% | 98% |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 92% | 93% |
| Category | Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 76 |
| Dry | 69 | 68 |
| Wet | 84 | 85 |
| Snow | 83 | 80 |
| Comfort | 76 | 76 |
| Noise | 33 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 74 |
| Efficiency | 79 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Winter Sport 5
UltraGrip 9+
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 7 tests that ran both, Dunlop Winter Sport 5 finished ahead 3 times and Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ 4 times.
| Discipline | Category | Winter Sport 5 | UltraGrip 9+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% | 94% | 0.0 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% | 98% | +0.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 70% | 80% | −10.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 92% | 97% | −5.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 90% | 97% | −6.3 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 94% | 92% | +2.0 | 2–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
| Wet Braking (concrete) | Wet | 92% | 91% | +1.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% | 98% | +1.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 50% | 50% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Ice Braking | Snow | 95% | 100% | −5.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 100% | 99% | +0.4 | 3–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 98% | 97% | +0.5 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Snow Handling (tester's mark) | Snow | 80% | 90% | −10.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 98% | 98% | −0.7 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 90% | 100% | −10.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Noise | Noise | 97% | 98% | −1.6 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 74% | 69% | +5.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 76% | 79% | −3.1 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 97% | 98% | −1.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 92% | 93% | −0.9 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 72% | 80% | −7.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #16/20 | #7/20 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Value | Cost | 60% | 79% | −19.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/16 | #3/16 | – | 3–4 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test · 205/60 R16 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | B · Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 46 | 19 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 14″ – 16″ |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Goodyear UltraGrip 9+
Too close to call: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 and Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ are within 2 points overall. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 is stronger on snow and treadwear. Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ is stronger on noise.
Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ scores 69 vs 33 on noise.
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 scores 83 vs 80 on snow.
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 scores 78 vs 75 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 84 vs 85 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Dunlop Winter Sport 5, 83 vs 80 on our snow score.
Goodyear UltraGrip 9+, 69 vs 33 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 76 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Dunlop Winter Sport 5, 78 vs 75 on our treadwear score.
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 78 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology