Head-to-head Updated

Falken Aklimate vs Firestone Winterforce LT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 34 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

Aklimate is ahead, 73–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Aklimate
Tire AFalken

Aklimate

All-Season tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 34 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Aklimate +7
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAklimateWinterforce LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7361

    Aklimate: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 71

    Winterforce LT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Aklimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Winterforce LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Aklimate +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAklimateWinterforce LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8072

    Aklimate: 60% × 75.8 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 77

    Winterforce LT: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Aklimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Winterforce LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Winterforce LT +5
    75
    Why this score
    SourceAklimateWinterforce LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6978

    Aklimate: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70

    Winterforce LT: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 75

    No road tests of snow for Aklimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Winterforce LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    Aklimate +10
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAklimateWinterforce LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7257

    Aklimate: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 72.1 = 71

    Winterforce LT: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 57.2 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Aklimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Winterforce LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    Aklimate +9
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAklimateWinterforce LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7756

    Aklimate: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 71

    Winterforce LT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Aklimate or Winterforce LT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Aklimate +11
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAklimateWinterforce LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7557

    Aklimate: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 72

    Winterforce LT: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 56.8 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Aklimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Winterforce LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

Scores at a glance
Falken Aklimate vs Firestone Winterforce LT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken AklimateFirestone Winterforce LT
Relative Score 73 67
Dry 71 64
Wet 77 72
Snow 70 75
Comfort 71 61
Noise 71 62
Treadwear 72 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Aklimate

± 8

Winterforce LT

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Aklimate

Pros

  • Exceptional winter traction and snow/ice handling
  • Low road noise and quiet ride
  • Smooth and comfortable bump absorption

Cons

  • Slightly spongy or reduced dry pavement handling compared to ultra-high-performance tires
  • Minor wheel spin from a dead stop on wet roads for some users
  • Inherent all-weather performance tradeoffs between winter grip and dry responsiveness
All owner themes in the Aklimate review

Tire B Winterforce LT

Pros

  • Excellent traction in snow, slush and mixed snow/ice conditions, including breaking trail through unplowed roads
  • Strong ice grip, even without studs
  • Good value for the money, with several reviewers calling it the best winter tire for the price

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise on dry pavement, according to one reviewer
  • Dry-road and non-winter characteristics are a lower priority, with one commercial user explicitly disregarding noise and other conditions
  • Not the cheapest option, according to one reviewer
All owner themes in the Winterforce LT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Aklimate B · Firestone Winterforce LT
CategoryAll-Season tireWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available9115
Rim diameters15″ – 22″16″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″16/32″
UTQG640 B A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi80 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Aklimate

Firestone Winterforce LT

Winner: Falken Aklimate — better treadwear, comfort and noise. Pick the Firestone Winterforce LT if snow matters most to you. Firestone Winterforce LT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken Aklimate scores 72 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken Aklimate scores 71 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Falken Aklimate scores 71 vs 62 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken Aklimate scores 71 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Falken Aklimate
Tire B · Firestone Winterforce LT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Aklimate or Winterforce LT?

Which is better in the wet, Aklimate or Winterforce LT?

Falken Aklimate, 77 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Aklimate or Winterforce LT?

Falken Aklimate, 71 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Aklimate or Winterforce LT?

Firestone Winterforce LT, 75 vs 70 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Aklimate or Winterforce LT?

Falken Aklimate, 71 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Aklimate or Winterforce LT?

Falken Aklimate, 71 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Aklimate or Winterforce LT?

Falken Aklimate, 72 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology