tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber Arctic LT vs Firestone Winterforce LT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Grabber Arctic LT 69, Winterforce LT 68.

Check price on Amazon · Grabber Arctic LT Check price on Amazon · Winterforce LT
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Grabber Arctic LT +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTWinterforce LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6961

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69

    Winterforce LT: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Winterforce LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Grabber Arctic LT +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTWinterforce LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7572

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 74

    Winterforce LT: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Winterforce LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Winterforce LT +5
    75
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTWinterforce LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7079

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 70

    Winterforce LT: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75

    No road tests of snow for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Winterforce LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Grabber Arctic LT +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTWinterforce LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6657

    Grabber Arctic LT: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.1 = 67

    Winterforce LT: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 57.2 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Winterforce LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 65

    Noise

    Grabber Arctic LT +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTWinterforce LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6456

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    Winterforce LT: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Grabber Arctic LT or Winterforce LT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Grabber Arctic LT +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTWinterforce LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6457

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65

    Winterforce LT: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Winterforce LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber Arctic LTFirestone Winterforce LT
Relative Score 69 68
Dry 69 64
Wet 74 72
Snow 70 75
Comfort 67 61
Noise 65 62
Treadwear 65 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Grabber Arctic LT

± 8

Winterforce LT

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber Arctic LT

Pros

  • Strong traction on packed snow, ice and freshly fallen unplowed snow, including on steep driveways
  • Marked improvement over previous all-season, all-terrain and 'no season' tires in slippery conditions
  • Improved braking and stopping in slippery conditions

Cons

  • One reviewer would like a more aggressive tread pattern
  • Tight fit when mounting on stock Ford wheels, though no leaks were reported in cold weather
  • Cost is not criticized directly, but one reviewer notes the Michelin Latitude X-Ice was 'quite expensive', implying the General is the more budget-oriented choice
All owner themes in the Grabber Arctic LT review

Tire B Winterforce LT

Pros

  • Excellent traction in snow, slush and mixed snow/ice conditions, including breaking trail through unplowed roads
  • Strong ice grip, even without studs
  • Good value for the money, with several reviewers calling it the best winter tire for the price

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise on dry pavement, according to one reviewer
  • Dry-road and non-winter characteristics are a lower priority, with one commercial user explicitly disregarding noise and other conditions
  • Not the cheapest option, according to one reviewer
All owner themes in the Winterforce LT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber Arctic LT B · Firestone Winterforce LT
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available615
Rim diameters16″ – 18″16″ – 20″
Tread depth16/32″16/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure80 psi80 psi
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber Arctic LT

Firestone Winterforce LT

Too close to call: General Grabber Arctic LT and Firestone Winterforce LT are within 2 points overall. General Grabber Arctic LT is stronger on comfort, dry and treadwear. Firestone Winterforce LT is stronger on snow. General Grabber Arctic LT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Firestone Winterforce LT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber Arctic LT scores 67 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber Arctic LT scores 69 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Firestone Winterforce LT scores 75 vs 70 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber Arctic LT scores 65 vs 61 on treadwear.

Tire A · General Grabber Arctic LT
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Firestone Winterforce LT
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber Arctic LT or Winterforce LT?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber Arctic LT or Winterforce LT?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber Arctic LT or Winterforce LT?

General Grabber Arctic LT, 69 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber Arctic LT or Winterforce LT?

Firestone Winterforce LT, 75 vs 70 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Grabber Arctic LT or Winterforce LT?

General Grabber Arctic LT, 65 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber Arctic LT or Winterforce LT?

General Grabber Arctic LT, 67 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber Arctic LT or Winterforce LT?

General Grabber Arctic LT, 65 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology