Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 7 reviews
General Grabber Arctic LT vs Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Grabber Arctic LT leads, 71–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 71 · 1 review
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Grabber Arctic LT +269Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic LT Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) – 68 Reviews found online 72 71 -
75
Wet
Grabber Arctic LT +570Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic LT Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 77 69 -
71
Snow
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +475Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic LT Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) – 73 Reviews found online 72 77 -
69
Comfort
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +271Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic LT Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online 70 69 -
66
Noise
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +571Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic LT Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) – 74 Reviews found online 66 – -
67
Treadwear
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +168Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic LT Winter i cept evo2 SUV Reviews found online 69 71 -
71
Handling
Grabber Arctic LT +269Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic LT Winter i cept evo2 SUV Reviews found online 71 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber Arctic LT | Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 70 |
| Dry | 71 | 69 |
| Wet | 75 | 70 |
| Snow | 71 | 75 |
| Comfort | 69 | 71 |
| Noise | 66 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 68 |
| Handling | 71 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Grabber Arctic LT
Winter i cept evo2 SUV
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber Arctic LT | B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 6 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 15″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 16/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 80 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
General Grabber Arctic LT
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV
Too close to call: General Grabber Arctic LT and Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV are within 2 points overall. General Grabber Arctic LT is stronger on wet. Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV is stronger on noise and snow.
General Grabber Arctic LT scores 75 vs 70 on wet.
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV scores 71 vs 66 on noise.
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV scores 75 vs 71 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.