tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber Arctic vs General Grabber Arctic LT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 18 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber Arctic leads, 71–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Grabber Arctic or Grabber Arctic LT on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Grabber Arctic LT +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticGrabber Arctic LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6569

    Grabber Arctic: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Grabber Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Level
    74
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticGrabber Arctic LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7576

    Grabber Arctic: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Grabber Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 78

    Snow

    Grabber Arctic +8
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticGrabber Arctic LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8270

    Grabber Arctic: 60% × 75.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 78

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Grabber Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticGrabber Arctic LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6867

    Grabber Arctic: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 67.9 = 68

    Grabber Arctic LT: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 66.9 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber Arctic or Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticGrabber Arctic LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6565

    Grabber Arctic: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66

    No road tests of noise for Grabber Arctic or Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Grabber Arctic +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber ArcticGrabber Arctic LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7263

    Grabber Arctic: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 69

    Grabber Arctic LT: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber Arctic LT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber ArcticGeneral Grabber Arctic LT
Relative Score 71 69
Dry 66 69
Wet 74 74
Snow 78 70
Comfort 68 68
Noise 66 66
Treadwear 69 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Grabber Arctic

± 8

Grabber Arctic LT

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber Arctic

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and handling in snow and slush
  • Great value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
  • Reliable cold-weather performance on wet and icy surfaces

Cons

  • Moderate road noise when studded or on dry/slightly wet pavement
  • Average performance on hard-packed ice unless studded
  • Directional/rotational tread pattern may limit tire rotation options for some drivers
All owner themes in the Grabber Arctic review

Tire B Grabber Arctic LT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber Arctic B · General Grabber Arctic LT
CategoryWinterWinter tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available66
Rim diameters16″ – 20″16″ – 18″
Tread depth12/32″16/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi80 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber Arctic

General Grabber Arctic LT

Narrow edge: General Grabber Arctic — better snow and treadwear. Pick the General Grabber Arctic LT if dry matters most to you. General Grabber Arctic rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional. General Grabber Arctic LT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber Arctic scores 78 vs 70 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber Arctic scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber Arctic LT scores 69 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · General Grabber Arctic
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber Arctic LT
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber Arctic or Grabber Arctic LT?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber Arctic or Grabber Arctic LT?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber Arctic or Grabber Arctic LT?

General Grabber Arctic LT, 69 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber Arctic or Grabber Arctic LT?

General Grabber Arctic, 78 vs 70 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Grabber Arctic or Grabber Arctic LT?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber Arctic or Grabber Arctic LT?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Grabber Arctic or Grabber Arctic LT?

General Grabber Arctic, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology