Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 33 reviews
Falken Aklimate vs Michelin Defender T+H — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Aklimate leads, 72–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 1 review
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Defender T+H +172Why this score
Source Aklimate Defender T+H Reviews found online 74 74 -
76
Wet
Aklimate +274Why this score
Source Aklimate Defender T+H Reviews found online 79 75 -
69
Snow
Aklimate +366Why this score
Source Aklimate Defender T+H Reviews found online 69 63 -
72
Comfort
Aklimate +270Why this score
Source Aklimate Defender T+H Reviews found online 74 70 -
71
Noise
Aklimate +368Why this score
Source Aklimate Defender T+H Reviews found online 77 70 -
70
Treadwear
Defender T+H +373Why this score
Source Aklimate Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online 74 70 -
–
Handling
No comparison72Why this score
Source Aklimate Defender T+H Reviews found online – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Aklimate | Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 71 |
| Dry | 71 | 72 |
| Wet | 76 | 74 |
| Snow | 69 | 66 |
| Comfort | 72 | 70 |
| Noise | 71 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 73 |
| Handling | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Aklimate
Defender T+H
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Aklimate
Pros
- Exceptional winter traction and snow/ice handling
- Low road noise and quiet ride
- Smooth and comfortable bump absorption
Cons
- Slightly spongy or reduced dry pavement handling compared to ultra-high-performance tires
- Minor wheel spin from a dead stop on wet roads for some users
- Inherent all-weather performance tradeoffs between winter grip and dry responsiveness
Tire B Defender T+H
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Aklimate | B · Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 89 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 B A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken Aklimate
Michelin Defender T+H
Too close to call: Falken Aklimate and Michelin Defender T+H are within 2 points overall. Falken Aklimate is stronger on snow and noise. Michelin Defender T+H is stronger on treadwear.
Falken Aklimate scores 69 vs 66 on snow.
Falken Aklimate scores 71 vs 68 on noise.
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 70 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.