Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 3 reviews
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat vs Firestone Destination M/T2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Destination M/T2 is ahead, 67–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 39 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Destination M/T2 +1469Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Destination M/T2 Reviews found online 48 70 -
59
Wet
Destination M/T2 +1271Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Destination M/T2 Reviews found online 55 72 -
–
Snow
No comparison70Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Destination M/T2 Reviews found online – 71 -
61
Comfort
Destination M/T2 +566Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Destination M/T2 Reviews found online 53 63 -
–
Noise
No comparison61Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Destination M/T2 Reviews found online – 52 -
56
Treadwear
Destination M/T2 +460Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Destination M/T2 Reviews found online 49 56 -
49
Handling
Destination M/T2 +1766Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Destination M/T2 Reviews found online 49 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat | Firestone Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 67 |
| Dry | 55 | 69 |
| Wet | 59 | 71 |
| Snow | – | 70 |
| Comfort | 61 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 60 |
| Handling | 49 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Azenis FK453 Runflat
Destination M/T2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Azenis FK453 Runflat
Pros
- Competitive pricing compared to premium run-flat alternatives
- Strong dry handling and cornering performance
- Lower noise levels than some factory-fitted run-flat tires
Cons
- Highly inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Mediocre wet weather grip, particularly in lateral cornering
- Vague steering feedback reported by some drivers
Tire B Destination M/T2
Pros
- Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
- Good highway manners and stable handling
Cons
- Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
- Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
- Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat | B · Firestone Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 18 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 19/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat
Firestone Destination M/T2
Winner: Firestone Destination M/T2 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 66 vs 49 on handling.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 69 vs 55 on dry.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 71 vs 59 on wet.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 66 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.