Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 10 reviews
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat vs Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · 3 reviews (needs 5)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
56
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat Azenis FK453 Runflat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) – Reviews found online 49 – Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
58
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat Azenis FK453 Runflat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) – Reviews found online 54 – Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 58
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
49
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat Azenis FK453 Runflat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) – Reviews found online 39 – Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 38.6 = 49
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
49
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat Azenis FK453 Runflat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) – Reviews found online 39 – Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat: 60% × 56.5 (est.) + 40% × 38.6 = 49
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat | Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | – |
| Dry | 56 | – |
| Wet | 58 | – |
| Comfort | 49 | – |
| Treadwear | 49 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Azenis FK453 Runflat
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Azenis FK453 Runflat
Pros
- Competitive pricing compared to premium run-flat alternatives
- Strong dry handling and cornering performance
- Lower noise levels than some factory-fitted run-flat tires
Cons
- Highly inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Mediocre wet weather grip, particularly in lateral cornering
- Vague steering feedback reported by some drivers
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat | B · Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat
Only Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology