tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis FK460 A/S vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 31 road tests and 29 + 910 owner reviews. How we score

Azenis FK510 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Azenis FK510 or Azenis FK460 A/S on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Azenis FK460 A/S
Tire AFalken

Azenis FK460 A/S

All Season

± 8

Tests 63 · 1 test Owners 69 · 29 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (noise (tester's mark))

Falken Azenis FK510
Tire BFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

± 5

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 910 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Azenis FK510 +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK460 A/SAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 28 tests6873
    Reviews found online7574

    Azenis FK460 A/S: 60% × 68.5 + 40% × 74.9 = 71

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 74.2 = 73

  2. 71

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +13
    84
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK460 A/SAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 29 tests7088
    Reviews found online7478

    Azenis FK460 A/S: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 73.6 = 71

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 77.9 = 84

  3. 39

    Snow

    Azenis FK510 +16
    55
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK460 A/SAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests32≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5045

    Azenis FK460 A/S: 60% × 31.9 + 40% × 50.1 = 39

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Azenis FK460 A/S +11
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK460 A/SAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 6 tests7240
    Reviews found online6467

    Azenis FK460 A/S: 40% × 71.7 + 60% × 63.7 = 67

    Azenis FK510: 40% × 40.3 + 60% × 66.9 = 56

  5. 70

    Noise

    Azenis FK460 A/S +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK460 A/SAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 18 tests7166
    Reviews found online6967

    Azenis FK460 A/S: 60% × 70.5 + 40% × 68.5 = 70

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.9 = 66

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Azenis FK460 A/S +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK460 A/SAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 68 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7154

    Azenis FK460 A/S: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 69

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Azenis FK460 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK460 A/SAzenis FK510
    Reviews found online7272
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK460 A/SAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests–50
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken Azenis FK460 A/SFalken Azenis FK510
Relative Score 66 70
Dry 71 73
Wet 71 84
Snow 39 55
Comfort 67 56
Noise 70 66
Treadwear 69 66
Handling (owners) 72 72
Efficiency – 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Azenis FK460 A/S

± 5

Azenis FK510

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryAzenis FK460 A/SAzenis FK510ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% #5/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test 94% #7/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #7/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test 97% #6/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 88% #3/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test 88% #7/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 98% #3/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test 98% #2/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #8/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test 96% #6/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 88% #7/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test 88% #5/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 97% #2/9 · 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test 70% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/9 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test #7/10 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis FK460 A/S

Pros

  • Exceptional value compared to premium segment competitors
  • Strong all-weather capability, including reliable performance in light snow
  • Low road noise levels and comfortable ride quality for a UHP tire

Cons

  • Reports of a firmer or harsher ride quality on uneven pavement
  • Potential for premature tread wear in some driving conditions
  • Isolated reports of hydroplaning and high-speed vibration issues
All owner themes in the Azenis FK460 A/S review

Tire B Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK460 A/S

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

r/TeslaModel3 ·1 upvote ·2024-02-10

“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2022-02-08

“Falken Azenis FK510 prices? Anyone know why the prices for Falken Azenis FK510's went up 25% or more in the last month? 235/40R18 went from $154 to $192. The whole benefit of these tires is that they offer PS4S performance for way less money. Now, you midaswhale just buy the Michelins. I haven't seen any other summer tires make that kind of a jump in price. I know Falken announced a price increase for 2022, but it was only like 5%. What's the dealio? Read more”
corvetteforum.com

“I've had a set of Falken Azenis FK510's on my car for a couple of months now, and just this past weekend took a trip through the twisties up to Prescott, and pushed the car as hard as I could heading up the mountain. I was a little nervous as I'd never used Falken tires before, but trusted in Tire Rack's reviews of them and pushed the envelope in every turn I hit. It was a pleasant surprise to find that the tires were gripping just as well as the much more expensive Michelin tires they'd replaced, and I even hit a personal best of .95g going around one of the more nasty turns. During this entire drive I never felt once like the tires weren't gripping perfectly, or that I was going to lose control from them breaking loose. Road noise is pretty much non-existent, and they seem to run pretty smooth over every surface I've driven them on so far. All-in-all I don't regret my purchase one bit, and if their longevity is anything like what I got out of my previous set of Michelins I'll definitely be buying another set once this one is done for.”
Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK460 A/S B · Falken Azenis FK510
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available8993
Rim diameters17″ – 22″17″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″10/32″
UTQG500 A A300 A A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi
Sizes in common5757

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis FK460 A/S

Falken Azenis FK510

Narrow edge: Falken Azenis FK510 — better snow and wet. Pick the Falken Azenis FK460 A/S if comfort, noise and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 55 vs 39 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 84 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken Azenis FK460 A/S scores 67 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Falken Azenis FK460 A/S scores 70 vs 66 on noise.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK460 A/S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Azenis FK460 A/S or Azenis FK510?

Which is better in the wet, Azenis FK460 A/S or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 84 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Azenis FK460 A/S or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Azenis FK460 A/S or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 55 vs 39 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Azenis FK460 A/S or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK460 A/S, 70 vs 66 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Azenis FK460 A/S or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK460 A/S, 67 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Azenis FK460 A/S or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK460 A/S, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology