Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 67 · 907 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 9 in 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Bridgestone Turanza T001 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Azenis FK510 is ahead, 72–64
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 59 · 2,185 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test (straight aqua)
“If you can, stick to the same tyre all around as mentioned, don’t mix brands or models. So if you're keeping the Turanza T001s up front, rather just get the same ones for the rear. The S001 is more performance-focused, but the T001 offers a better balance of comfort and durability. It’s quieter, rides smoother, and tends to last longer. That said, if you’re thinking about moving to something sportier, skip the S001 and go straight to the Potenza Sport. It’s a newer and more advanced tyre, still within the Bridgestone family, and a solid upgrade in terms of grip and responsiveness.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Azenis FK510 +866Why this score
Source Azenis FK510 Turanza T001 Professional tests (TWG score) 73 69 Reviews found online 76 61 Dry Braking (% of best) 97% 95% -
83
Wet
Azenis FK510 +1271Why this score
Source Azenis FK510 Turanza T001 Professional tests (TWG score) 87 76 Reviews found online 77 64 Wet Braking (% of best) 100% 100% -
55
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Azenis FK510 Turanza T001 Reviews found online 45 – -
52
Comfort
Turanza T001 +1365Why this score
Source Azenis FK510 Turanza T001 Professional tests (TWG score) 42 – Reviews found online 68 61 -
68
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Azenis FK510 Turanza T001 Professional tests (TWG score) 67 – Reviews found online 68 – -
66
Treadwear
Azenis FK510 +858Why this score
Source Azenis FK510 Turanza T001 Professional tests (TWG score) 72 – Reviews found online 57 52 -
71
Handling
Azenis FK510 +1259Why this score
Source Azenis FK510 Turanza T001 Reviews found online 71 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis FK510 | Bridgestone Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 64 |
| Dry | 74 | 66 |
| Wet | 83 | 71 |
| Snow | 55 | – |
| Comfort | 52 | 65 |
| Noise | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 58 |
| Handling | 71 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Azenis FK510
64
/ 100
Turanza T001
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Azenis FK510 | Turanza T001 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 95% #6/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | +2.1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 84% #5/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 81% #10/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | +3.1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 14% #7/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | 25% #4/14 · 2012 European Summer Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 | −10.7 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 94% #7/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | −6.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #3/9 · 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test | 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | −0.4 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Azenis FK510
Pros
- Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
- Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
Tire B Turanza T001
Pros
- Good dry grip and stable highway handling
- Comfortable ride quality with low road noise on many surfaces
- Solid steering feedback and direct road feel
Cons
- Accelerated and uneven tread wear, particularly on front or drive wheels
- Inconsistent or poor wet grip, with several users reporting aquaplaning risks
- Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh or firm ride over uneven surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Falken Azenis FK510
Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.
r/Porsche
·1 upvote ·2025-03-27
“Do you mean FK510? These are mid range UHP tyres and usually perform near the bottom when tested against other UHP tyres: Poor braking performance and oversteer balance would be my main concerns based on those test results. I wouldn't run FK510s on any of my RWD cars but if cost is your main concern then you do you.”
mustang6g.com
·2019-12-06
“I picked up a very nice used 2018 GT Premium auto in Jacksonville, NC on Tuesday. The dealership put a set of new Falken 510s on it and having had mostly Michelins, expected "blah". Not so! Drove to Charlotte and back to Oakland, MI. About 1,000 miles. Fast, slow, city, highway. The tires are very comfortable soaking holes and bumps very well. Quiet. Handle much better than I would have imagined. Providing they don't start making a lot of noises, etc, I would consider replacing them when they wear out. Tire Rack has them at $194 for the 265/35ZR20s which are the size the car came with. The Michelins were $350 each for the same size. So far the tire is a steal. So, those on a budget have an opportunity to get stellar performance for almost 1/2 the price. Impressed!”
r/TeslaModelS
·1 upvote ·2025-11-28
“2022 MS Plaid on 21" archnids. Factory Michelins replaced at 7,500 miles (at wear markers). FK510's after 9,000 miles on the rubber are at 7/32. Expecting another 5,000 miles or so. They're comparable treadwear rating but last longer. Heavy car with lots of torque will inevitably go through tires sooner than the rated mileage. I'm fortunate to have decent alignment from the factory as the wear was even. Good luck on the next set of tires.”
Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving
Based on 63 community posts
Tire B
Neutral
Bridgestone Turanza T001
Community discussions around the Bridgestone Turanza T001 largely center on replacement decisions, tire longevity, and tread aging. Users note that the tire provides a good balance of comfort, durability, and low road noise compared to sportier alternatives, though owners frequently question surface cracking after four years of use.
r/tires
·8 upvotes ·2022-08-18
“Bridgestone turanza t001 do I need to replace them with these small cracks ? It’s 4 year old since production and is it dangerous to travel alot with these small cracks?”
r/CarTalkUK
·1 upvote ·2022-08-08
“Bridgestone turanza T001 and it’s 4 year old so do I need to change it or just wait for another year the cracks don’t seem to be deep to me so I need an expert on that it drives like it does normally doesn’t leak any air and the grip is fine”
r/CarsIndia
·8 upvotes ·2023-01-27
“Just got a new set of tyres - Bridgestone Turanza T001 215/60/R16 at 77k kms.”
Top themes
#tread wear and longevity#surface cracking concerns#ride comfort and noise#tire replacement options#comparisons with performance tires
Based on 8 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis FK510 | B · Bridgestone Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 93 | 37 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Falken Azenis FK510
64
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza T001
Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza T001 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 65 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 83 vs 71 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 71 vs 59 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 74 vs 66 on dry.
Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Bridgestone Turanza T001
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.