Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 67 · 905 reviews

“Faulken azenis fk510 tires Anyone running these , I’ve ordered a set of wheels and tires from steeda, unfortunately they do not have any nitto n555 g2 tires available i the sizes ive requested “nothing close infact to get a complete set” ive checked all the distributors thru my job and websites. They have however come up with a set of these 275/35/19 fronts and 305/30/19 rears , in comparison the rears will sit approximately 1/2 lower then fronts which will eliminate some rake with the car. Does anyone have experience with these tires? Money wise ill save like 200$ though money is not a factor as oppse to my car came with 235”s and they have to go.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Assurance ComforTred Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)72–
    Reviews found online76–
  2. 83

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Assurance ComforTred Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)87–
    Reviews found online77–
  3. 55

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Assurance ComforTred Touring
    Reviews found online45–
  4. 52

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Assurance ComforTred Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)42–
    Reviews found online68–
  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Assurance ComforTred Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)68–
    Reviews found online68–
  6. 66

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Assurance ComforTred Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)72–
    Reviews found online57–
  7. 71

    Handling

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Assurance ComforTred Touring
    Reviews found online71–
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring
Relative Score 70 –
Dry 74 –
Wet 83 –
Snow 55 –
Comfort 52 –
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 66 –
Handling 71 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Azenis FK510

Assurance ComforTred Touring

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

Tire B Assurance ComforTred Touring

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Based on 25 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring
CategorySummerTouring All Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available93—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—
Tread depth10/32″11 - 12/32″
UTQG300 A A640 - 740 A B
SidewallBlackwallVertical Serrated Band
Max pressure50 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis FK510

Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring

Only Falken Azenis FK510 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.