Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (value)
“2022 MS Plaid on 21" archnids. Factory Michelins replaced at 7,500 miles (at wear markers). FK510's after 9,000 miles on the rubber are at 7/32. Expecting another 5,000 miles or so. They're comparable treadwear rating but last longer. Heavy car with lots of torque will inevitably go through tires sooner than the rated mileage. I'm fortunate to have decent alignment from the factory as the wear was even. Good luck on the next set of tires.”
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“That would tally with what this person found with the 127 variant that preceded it “Hi just for information,I asked Hankook what tread depth when new was on their Ventus S1 Evo 3 K127 tyre, the reply was 6.6 mm””
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
74
Dry
Ventus S1 evo3 +2
76
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Ventus S1 evo3
Professional tests (TWG score)
73
84
Reviews found online
76
63
Dry Braking (% of best)
94%
99%
Dry Handling (% of best)
99%
98%
83
Wet
Azenis FK510 +2
81
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Ventus S1 evo3
Professional tests (TWG score)
87
88
Reviews found online
77
69
Longitudinal Aquaplaning (% of best)
60%
98%
Transverse Aquaplaning (% of best)
70%
87%
Wet Braking (% of best)
91%
100%
Wet Circle (% of best)
94%
98%
Wet Handling (% of best)
99%
96%
55
Snow
No comparison
–
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Ventus S1 evo3
Reviews found online
45
–
52
Comfort
Ventus S1 evo3 +10
62
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Ventus S1 evo3
Professional tests (TWG score)
42
65
Reviews found online
68
59
68
Noise
Ventus S1 evo3 +3
71
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Ventus S1 evo3
Professional tests (TWG score)
67
74
Reviews found online
68
–
66
Treadwear
Azenis FK510 +11
55
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Ventus S1 evo3
Professional tests (TWG score)
72
61
Reviews found online
57
46
71
Handling
Azenis FK510 +11
60
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Ventus S1 evo3
Reviews found online
71
60
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Falken Azenis FK510
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Relative Score
72
69
Dry
74
76
Wet
83
81
Snow
55
–
Comfort
52
62
Noise
68
71
Treadwear
66
55
Handling
71
60
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Azenis FK510
69
/ 100
Ventus S1 evo3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
Discipline
Category
Azenis FK510
Ventus S1 evo3
Δ
Both?
Curved Aquaplaning
Curved
96%#4/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test
86%#9/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test
+9.9
Different tests
Dry Braking
Dry
94%#7/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test
99%#3/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test
−4.4
Different tests
Dry Handling
Dry
99%#6/9 · 2017 EVO Summer Tyre Test
98%#7/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test
+1.2
Different tests
Rolling Resistance
Efficiency
91%#8/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test
90%#7/15 · 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test
+0.9
Different tests
Noise
Other
99%#4/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test
100%#2/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test
−0.7
Different tests
Price
Other
86%#3/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test
75%#12/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test
+10.5
Different tests
Value
Other
100%#1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
58%#15/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test
+42.2
Different tests
Wear
Other
87%#2/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
76%#7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
+10.7
Different tests
Overall Ranking
Overall
13%#8/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
33%#3/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test
−20.8
Different tests
Straight Aqua
Straight
100%#2/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test
94%#6/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test
+5.4
Different tests
Subj. Comfort
Subj
70%#8/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
70%#7/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test
0.0
Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling
Subj
75%#7/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test
70%#7/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test
+4.6
Different tests
Subj. Wet Handling
Subj
70%#8/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
80%#3/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test
−10.0
Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership
Total
0%#6/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
0%#14/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test
0.0
Different tests
Longitudinal Aquaplaning
Wet
60%#9/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
98%#3/7 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test
−38.2
Different tests
Transverse Aquaplaning
Wet
70%#6/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
87%#6/7 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test
−16.8
Different tests
Wet Braking
Wet
91%#3/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test
100%#2/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test
−8.7
Different tests
Wet Circle
Wet
94%#5/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test
98%#3/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test
−3.6
Different tests
Wet Handling
Wet
99%#8/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test
96%#11/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
+2.9
Different tests
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Azenis FK510
Pros
Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well
Cons
Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Falken Azenis FK510
Mixed
Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Road noise levels#Tread wear and longevity#OEM fitments and EV variants#Run-flat identification confusion#Ride comfort
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
Attribute
A · Falken Azenis FK510
B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Category
Summer
Summer
Vehicle type
Passenger Car / Crossover
Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available
93
110
Rim diameters
17″ – 22″
17″ – 22″
Tread depth
10/32″
—
UTQG
300 A A
—
Sidewall
Blackwall
—
Max pressure
50 psi
—
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Falken Azenis FK510
69
/ 100
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 if comfort and noise matter most to you.
Pick tire AYou want the longest tread life
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 66 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire AYou enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 71 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire BYou want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 62 vs 52 on comfort.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.