Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Azenis FK510 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 67 · 907 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (value)

“2022 MS Plaid on 21" archnids. Factory Michelins replaced at 7,500 miles (at wear markers). FK510's after 9,000 miles on the rubber are at 7/32. Expecting another 5,000 miles or so. They're comparable treadwear rating but last longer. Heavy car with lots of torque will inevitably go through tires sooner than the rated mileage. I'm fortunate to have decent alignment from the factory as the wear was even. Good luck on the next set of tires.”

Tire BHankook

Ventus S1 evo3

Summer

Tests 76 · 19 tests Owners 59 · 3,355 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“That would tally with what this person found with the 127 variant that preceded it “Hi just for information,I asked Hankook what tread depth when new was on their Ventus S1 Evo 3 K127 tyre, the reply was 6.6 mm””

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Ventus S1 evo3 +2
    76
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score)7384
    Reviews found online7663
    Dry Braking (% of best)94%99%
    Dry Handling (% of best)99%98%
  2. 83

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +2
    81
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score)8788
    Reviews found online7769
    Longitudinal Aquaplaning (% of best)60%98%
    Transverse Aquaplaning (% of best)70%87%
    Wet Braking (% of best)91%100%
    Wet Circle (% of best)94%98%
    Wet Handling (% of best)99%96%
  3. 55

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ventus S1 evo3
    Reviews found online45–
  4. 52

    Comfort

    Ventus S1 evo3 +10
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score)4265
    Reviews found online6859
  5. 68

    Noise

    Ventus S1 evo3 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score)6774
    Reviews found online68–
  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Azenis FK510 +11
    55
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score)7261
    Reviews found online5746
  7. 71

    Handling

    Azenis FK510 +11
    60
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ventus S1 evo3
    Reviews found online7160
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Relative Score 72 69
Dry 74 76
Wet 83 81
Snow 55 –
Comfort 52 62
Noise 68 71
Treadwear 66 55
Handling 71 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Azenis FK510

Ventus S1 evo3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryAzenis FK510Ventus S1 evo3ΔBoth?
Curved Aquaplaning Curved 96% #4/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test 86% #9/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test +9.9 Different tests
Dry Braking Dry 94% #7/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test 99% #3/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test −4.4 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #6/9 · 2017 EVO Summer Tyre Test 98% #7/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test +1.2 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 91% #8/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test 90% #7/15 · 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test +0.9 Different tests
Noise Other 99% #4/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test 100% #2/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test −0.7 Different tests
Price Other 86% #3/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 75% #12/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test +10.5 Different tests
Value Other 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 58% #15/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test +42.2 Different tests
Wear Other 87% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 76% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +10.7 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 13% #8/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 33% #3/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test −20.8 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 100% #2/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 94% #6/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test +5.4 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 70% #8/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 70% #7/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 0.0 Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling Subj 75% #7/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test 70% #7/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test +4.6 Different tests
Subj. Wet Handling Subj 70% #8/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 80% #3/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test −10.0 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #6/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #14/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test 0.0 Different tests
Longitudinal Aquaplaning Wet 60% #9/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 98% #3/7 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test −38.2 Different tests
Transverse Aquaplaning Wet 70% #6/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 87% #6/7 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test −16.8 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 91% #3/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test 100% #2/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test −8.7 Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 94% #5/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test 98% #3/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test −3.6 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #8/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test 96% #11/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +2.9 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

Tire B Ventus S1 evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
  • Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

corvetteforum.com

“I purchased a full set of Falken Azenis FK510 tires in January of last year. Ride, quietness, and wet/dry handling were all right on the money with the Tire Rack and other reviews that I looked over when deciding which tires to buy. Now I'm wishing I'd gone ahead and spent the extra money to get another set of Michelins. The rear tires are completely worn down now after only daily driving the car and putting maybe 15k miles on the tires. The same driving conditions with the previous Michelin PSIII tires resulted in the tires lasting for 5 years and 50k miles. Tread wear is the only complaint I have with these tires, but it is one massive issue with tires only lasting 15k miles with tame daily driving. My advice is to spend the extra money and get the Michelin tires. That's what I'll be doing this weekend.”

r/Mustang ·1 upvote ·2025-12-28

“Accidentally bought a Falken FK510 at discount tire when my other rear tire is a FK460A/S I have a brand new 460A/S on my driver rear a week ago and I went to discount yesterday and accidentally bought the 510 for my passenger rear. My biggest concerns is the difference in grip and wear and for the torsen limited slip on my GT PP1. I just daily my car to work and floor it at lights and don’t do canyon or track runs. I saw discount tire has a return / exchange policy, has anyone gone this route?”

mustang6g.com ·2019-12-06

“I picked up a very nice used 2018 GT Premium auto in Jacksonville, NC on Tuesday. The dealership put a set of new Falken 510s on it and having had mostly Michelins, expected "blah". Not so! Drove to Charlotte and back to Oakland, MI. About 1,000 miles. Fast, slow, city, highway. The tires are very comfortable soaking holes and bumps very well. Quiet. Handle much better than I would have imagined. Providing they don't start making a lot of noises, etc, I would consider replacing them when they wear out. Tire Rack has them at $194 for the 265/35ZR20s which are the size the car came with. The Michelins were $350 each for the same size. So far the tire is a steal. So, those on a budget have an opportunity to get stellar performance for almost 1/2 the price. Impressed!”

Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Mixed

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Road noise levels#Tread wear and longevity#OEM fitments and EV variants#Run-flat identification confusion#Ride comfort

Based on 33 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available93110
Rim diameters17″ – 22″17″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis FK510

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 if comfort and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 66 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 71 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 62 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 71 vs 68 on noise.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

72

Narrow edge

Azenis FK510

Amazon