Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Azenis FK510 is ahead, 70–51

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 67 · 905 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 6 in 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test (overall ranking)

“Faulken azenis fk510 tires Anyone running these , I’ve ordered a set of wheels and tires from steeda, unfortunately they do not have any nitto n555 g2 tires available i the sizes ive requested “nothing close infact to get a complete set” ive checked all the distributors thru my job and websites. They have however come up with a set of these 275/35/19 fronts and 305/30/19 rears , in comparison the rears will sit approximately 1/2 lower then fronts which will eliminate some rake with the car. Does anyone have experience with these tires? Money wise ill save like 200$ though money is not a factor as oppse to my car came with 235”s and they have to go.”

Tire BKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 273 reviews

Best test result: #8 of 9 in 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 (overall ranking)

“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Azenis FK510 +27
    47
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)72–
    Reviews found online7636
  2. 83

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +29
    54
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)87–
    Reviews found online7749
  3. 55

    Snow

    Crugen HP71 +2
    57
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Crugen HP71
    Reviews found online4548
  4. 52

    Comfort

    Crugen HP71 +3
    55
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)42–
    Reviews found online6840
  5. 68

    Noise

    Azenis FK510 +11
    57
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)68–
    Reviews found online6843
  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Azenis FK510 +22
    44
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)72–
    Reviews found online5730
  7. 71

    Handling

    Azenis FK510 +16
    55
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Crugen HP71
    Reviews found online7155
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Kumho Crugen HP71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Kumho Crugen HP71
Relative Score 70 51
Dry 74 47
Wet 83 54
Snow 55 57
Comfort 52 55
Noise 68 57
Treadwear 66 44
Handling 71 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Azenis FK510

Crugen HP71

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryAzenis FK510Crugen HP71ΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 20% #5/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test 22% #8/9 · 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 −2.2 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

Tire B Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Based on 25 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinion on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is heavily mixed, largely split between appreciation for its comfortable, quiet ride and affordability compared to premium brands, versus frequent complaints about rapid tread wear, particularly on heavier electric vehicles. While many drivers praise initial grip, handling, and value, concerns persist regarding longevity, internal acoustic foam separation issues, and premature wear relative to advertised mileage warranties.

Top themes
#Tread wear and longevity#Ride comfort and noise#EV performance and weight#Pricing and value#Acoustic foam issues#Handling and traction

Based on 34 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Kumho Crugen HP71
CategorySummerSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available9363
Rim diameters17″ – 22″16″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″9.9/32″
UTQG300 A A640 A A
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis FK510

Kumho Crugen HP71

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, dry and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP71 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 83 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 74 vs 47 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 66 vs 44 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 71 vs 55 on handling.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Leads

Azenis FK510

Amazon