Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 31 + 0 road tests and 907 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Azenis FK510 is ahead, 75–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Azenis FK510
Tire AFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

± 4

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 907 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Michelin Pilot Sport 3
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 3

Summer tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Azenis FK510 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / – tests73≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7569

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 74

    Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 85

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +15
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 29 / – tests89≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7870

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 89 + 40% × 78.3 = 85

    Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 55

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)–
    Reviews found online46–

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 3 +6
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests42≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6860

    Azenis FK510: 40% × 41.7 + 60% × 67.6 = 57

    Pilot Sport 3: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 59.8 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests66–
    Reviews found online67–

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.3 = 67

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Azenis FK510 +6
    60
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests73≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5457

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66

    Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Reviews found online72–
  8. 51

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / – tests51–
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Michelin Pilot Sport 3
Relative Score 75 67
Dry 74 69
Wet 85 70
Snow 55 –
Comfort 57 63
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 66 60
Handling (owners) 72 –
Efficiency 51 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Azenis FK510

± 8

Pilot Sport 3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

Tire B Pilot Sport 3

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

r/CarTrackDays ·4 upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

r/Autocross ·1 upvote ·2023-12-18

“Funny, I just had this conversation in r/ecoboostmustang . I was in this exact boat when I first started out autocrossing. I got on 200 TW for 2020 but continued to HPDE on the daily summer tires. Indy 500 - Spring 2019 to Winter 2020 - These take an INCREDIBLE amount of abuse for the money. 30+ autocrosses, 2 HPDEs, 18,000 miles G-Max RS - Fall 2020 to Summer 2021 - Only bummer is they're directional, you technically shouldn't rotate. 10 HPDEs, 15,000 miles Falken FK510 - Spring 2020 to Summer 2020 - HARD NO from me. I corded a set in 10,000 miles between daily & 6 HPDEs.”

corvetteforum.com

“I've had a set of Falken Azenis FK510's on my car for a couple of months now, and just this past weekend took a trip through the twisties up to Prescott, and pushed the car as hard as I could heading up the mountain. I was a little nervous as I'd never used Falken tires before, but trusted in Tire Rack's reviews of them and pushed the envelope in every turn I hit. It was a pleasant surprise to find that the tires were gripping just as well as the much more expensive Michelin tires they'd replaced, and I even hit a personal best of .95g going around one of the more nasty turns. During this entire drive I never felt once like the tires weren't gripping perfectly, or that I was going to lose control from them breaking loose. Road noise is pretty much non-existent, and they seem to run pretty smooth over every surface I've driven them on so far. All-in-all I don't regret my purchase one bit, and if their longevity is anything like what I got out of my previous set of Michelins I'll definitely be buying another set once this one is done for.”

Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 3
CategorySummerSummer tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available9310
Rim diameters17″ – 22″15″ – 19″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis FK510

Michelin Pilot Sport 3

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, treadwear and dry. Pick the Michelin Pilot Sport 3 if comfort matters most to you. Michelin Pilot Sport 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 85 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 66 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 63 vs 57 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 74 vs 69 on dry.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Azenis FK510 or Pilot Sport 3?

Which is better in the wet, Azenis FK510 or Pilot Sport 3?

Falken Azenis FK510, 85 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Azenis FK510 or Pilot Sport 3?

Falken Azenis FK510, 74 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Azenis FK510 or Pilot Sport 3?

Michelin Pilot Sport 3, 63 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Azenis FK510 or Pilot Sport 3?

Falken Azenis FK510, 66 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology