Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Azenis FK510 is ahead, 72–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 73 · 31 tests Owners 67 · 905 reviews

“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Azenis FK510 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)74–
    Reviews found online7773
  2. 79

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)81–
    Reviews found online7569
  3. 56

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Reviews found online46–
  4. 60

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 3 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)55–
    Reviews found online6962
  5. 68

    Noise

    Azenis FK510 +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)68–
    Reviews found online6963
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Azenis FK510 +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)72–
    Reviews found online5858
  7. 71

    Handling

    Azenis FK510 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 3
    Reviews found online7165
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Michelin Pilot Sport 3
Relative Score 72 67
Dry 75 72
Wet 79 69
Snow 56 –
Comfort 60 65
Noise 68 65
Treadwear 67 61
Handling 71 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Azenis FK510

Pilot Sport 3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

Tire B Pilot Sport 3

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2022-02-08

“Falken Azenis FK510 prices? Anyone know why the prices for Falken Azenis FK510's went up 25% or more in the last month? 235/40R18 went from $154 to $192. The whole benefit of these tires is that they offer PS4S performance for way less money. Now, you midaswhale just buy the Michelins. I haven't seen any other summer tires make that kind of a jump in price. I know Falken announced a price increase for 2022, but it was only like 5%. What's the dealio? Read more”

r/TeslaModel3 ·1 upvote ·2024-02-10

“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”

r/CarTrackDays ·4 upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Based on 25 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 3
CategorySummer—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available68—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis FK510

Michelin Pilot Sport 3

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, treadwear and handling. Pick the Michelin Pilot Sport 3 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 79 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 67 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 71 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 65 vs 60 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

72

Leads

Azenis FK510

Amazon