Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“Funny, I just had this conversation in r/ecoboostmustang . I was in this exact boat when I first started out autocrossing. I got on 200 TW for 2020 but continued to HPDE on the daily summer tires. Indy 500 - Spring 2019 to Winter 2020 - These take an INCREDIBLE amount of abuse for the money. 30+ autocrosses, 2 HPDEs, 18,000 miles G-Max RS - Fall 2020 to Summer 2021 - Only bummer is they're directional, you technically shouldn't rotate. 10 HPDEs, 15,000 miles Falken FK510 - Spring 2020 to Summer 2020 - HARD NO from me. I corded a set in 10,000 miles between daily & 6 HPDEs.”
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 (steering response)
“Wow! You burn rubber. I totally appreciate what you’ve said and on my old e60 I ran both contis D06 and Michelins ps4 for 3 sets each. Both different feel and wear. Contis lasted longer but didn’t feel as nice as PS4. Now I’m in another BMW and cannot rotate the same way with a staggered wheel size. I’m in NC, when I drove PS4, in cold weather, they wore out quickly. They are a summer tire for sure, but I will use a slightly higher pressure to lengthen service life. That camber is rough on the inner tire shoulder / tread and the all season contains held up better there.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
74
Dry
Pilot Sport 4 +11
85
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Pilot Sport 4
Professional tests (TWG score)
73
88
Reviews found online
76
81
Dry Braking (% of best)
98%
100%
Dry Handling (% of best)
99%
100%
83
Wet
Pilot Sport 4 +4
87
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Pilot Sport 4
Professional tests (TWG score)
87
91
Reviews found online
77
81
Longitudinal Aquaplaning (% of best)
60%
80%
Transverse Aquaplaning (% of best)
70%
80%
Wet Braking (% of best)
93%
98%
Wet Circle (% of best)
98%
97%
Wet Handling (% of best)
97%
98%
55
Snow
No comparison
–
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Pilot Sport 4
Reviews found online
45
–
52
Comfort
Pilot Sport 4 +26
78
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Pilot Sport 4
Professional tests (TWG score)
42
83
Reviews found online
68
71
68
Noise
Pilot Sport 4 +6
74
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Pilot Sport 4
Professional tests (TWG score)
67
76
Reviews found online
68
72
Exterior Noise (% of best)
70%
90%
66
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 4 +4
70
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Pilot Sport 4
Professional tests (TWG score)
72
76
Reviews found online
57
61
71
Handling
Pilot Sport 4 +7
78
Why this score
Source
Azenis FK510
Pilot Sport 4
Reviews found online
71
78
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Falken Azenis FK510
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Relative Score
72
80
Dry
74
85
Wet
83
87
Snow
55
–
Comfort
52
78
Noise
68
74
Treadwear
66
70
Handling
71
78
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Azenis FK510
80
/ 100
Pilot Sport 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
Discipline
Category
Azenis FK510
Pilot Sport 4
Δ
Both?
Curved Aquaplaning
Curved
100%#2/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test
89%#6/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test
+11.0
Different tests
Dry Braking
Dry
98%#7/9 · 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test
100%#3/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test
−1.9
Different tests
Dry Handling
Dry
99%#6/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test
100%#2/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test
−0.7
Different tests
Rolling Resistance
Efficiency
91%#8/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test
97%#4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test
−6.2
Same test
Exterior Noise
Noise
70%#8/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
90%#3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
−20.0
Same test
Noise
Other
97%#9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test
99%#3/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test
−2.2
Different tests
Price
Other
99%#2/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test
63%#9/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test
+36.0
Different tests
Safety
Other
60%#10/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
90%#2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
−30.0
Same test
Steering Response
Other
67%#10/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
100%#1/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
−33.3
Same test
Wet Lateral Stability
Other
80%#3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
70%#8/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
+10.0
Same test
Value
Other
74%#5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
59%#20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
+14.4
Different tests
Wear
Other
87%#2/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
96%#5/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
−9.5
Different tests
Overall Ranking
Overall
13%#8/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test
100%#1/9 · 2017 EVO Summer Tyre Test
−87.5
Different tests
Straight Aqua
Straight
100%#2/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test
99%#3/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test
+0.8
Different tests
Subj. Comfort
Subj
60%#8/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test
90%#3/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
−30.0
Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling
Subj
75%#7/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test
90%#2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
−15.4
Different tests
Subj. Wet Handling
Subj
88%#5/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test
96%#2/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test
−7.8
Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership
Total
0%#9/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
0%#16/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
0.0
Different tests
Longitudinal Aquaplaning
Wet
60%#9/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
80%#2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
−20.0
Same test
Transverse Aquaplaning
Wet
70%#6/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
80%#5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
−10.0
Same test
Wet Braking
Wet
93%#8/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test
98%#2/10 · 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test
−4.5
Different tests
Wet Circle
Wet
98%#6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test
97%#4/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test
+1.0
Different tests
Wet Handling
Wet
97%#6/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test
98%#5/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test
−0.6
Same test
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Azenis FK510
Pros
Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well
Cons
Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Falken Azenis FK510
Mixed
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance
Based on 25 community posts
Tire B
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Positive
Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (and PS4S/AS variants) is overwhelmingly positive, with users frequently praising the massive upgrades in grip, wet weather performance, and steering feel compared to stock run-flats or budget tires. While some note trade-offs in tread life, cost, and colder temperature performance, they are widely regarded as a top-tier choice for daily driving and spirited handling.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.