Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 17 + 8 road tests and 589 + 1,068 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta Sport PS72 leads, 80–78 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 82 · 17 tests Owners 72 · 589 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)
“Got some new tires mounted, excited to test the Falken FK520. 225/40&255/35/18 Idk why, but testing new tires is exciting and fun. Love how these tires look so far.. Read more”
Tests 78 · 8 tests Owners 83 · 1,068 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wet handling (tester's mark))
“I’m on the Kumho sport ps72 and in the dry on road they are great, wet road- great, dry track also great but on wet track; a little unpredictable.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Azenis FK520 | Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 8 tests | 86 | 87 |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 85 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 | 95% | 95% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 97% | 98% |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 53% | 80% |
Azenis FK520: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 73.7 = 81
Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 85.3 = 86
| Source | Azenis FK520 | Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 8 tests | 84 | 88 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 88 |
| Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 85% | 94% |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 95% | 96% |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 84% | 100% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 | 93% | 93% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 96% | 96% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 97% | 98% |
Azenis FK520: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 75.3 = 81
Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 87.5 = 88
| Source | Azenis FK520 | Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 5 tests | 80 | 58 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 75 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 91% | 91% |
Azenis FK520: 40% × 79.8 + 60% × 68.8 = 73
Ecsta Sport PS72: 40% × 57.9 + 60% × 75.4 = 68
| Source | Azenis FK520 | Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 7 tests | 74 | 63 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 | 96% | 94% |
Azenis FK520: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71
Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64
No owner ratings of noise for Azenis FK520 or Ecsta Sport PS72. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Azenis FK520 | Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests | 81 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 78 |
| Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 86% | 70% |
| Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 82% | 76% |
Azenis FK520: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 67.4 = 75
Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 78 = 73
| Source | Azenis FK520 | Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 74 | 86 |
| Source | Azenis FK520 | Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 5 tests | 70 | 71 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 | 90% | 86% |
| Category | Falken Azenis FK520 | Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 80 |
| Dry | 81 | 86 |
| Wet | 81 | 88 |
| Comfort | 73 | 68 |
| Noise | 71 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 86 |
| Efficiency | 70 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Azenis FK520
Ecsta Sport PS72
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Falken Azenis FK520 finished ahead 1 times and Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 3 times.
| Discipline | Category | Azenis FK520 | Ecsta Sport PS72 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% | 95% | +0.2 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? · 245/45 R19 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% | 98% | −1.7 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 53% | 80% | −27.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 85% | 94% | −8.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 255/45 R 19 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 95% | 96% | −0.7 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% | 93% | +0.3 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? · 245/45 R19 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 96% | 96% | +0.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 255/45 R 19 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% | 98% | −0.8 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 84% | 100% | −16.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 91% | 91% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Noise | Noise | 96% | 94% | +2.4 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 86% #7/7 · 2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 86% | 70% | +16.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 82% | 76% | +6.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 90% | 86% | +4.0 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #4/20 | #6/20 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Value | Cost | 86% | 89% | −2.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R19 |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 71% | 69% | +2.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 255/45 R 19 |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 98% | 99% | −1.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 255/45 R 19 |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 87% | 95% | −7.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 255/45 R 19 |
| Sand Traction | Off-road | 100% | 94% | +6.5 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 255/45 R 19 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/10 | #7/10 | – | 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally views the Falken Azenis FK520 as a reliable, reasonably priced tire offering good comfort, quiet operation, and competent wet and dry performance. While praised as a cost-effective alternative to top-tier brands, some drivers note that it behaves more like a touring tire than a sharp ultra-high-performance option and may struggle for traction on higher-powered, tuned vehicles.
“Escolha de pneus - consumo de combustível Estou a ver pneus para um dos carros cá de casa (Nissan Qashqai) que usa 225/45 R19. E estava a apontar para os Falken Azenis FK520 ou os Hankook Ventus S1 Evo3 K127, ambos de Verão. Apesar de a Hankook ser considerada "premium", os Falken são mais caros mas também têm rebordo de proteção de jante (que estes Hankook não têm). No entanto, entretanto encontrei os Pirelli Powergy, também de Verão, mas com a diferença de ter classificação B no consumo de combustível, ao invés da categoria C dos Falken e Hankook. Custam mais 30€ que os Hankook e mais 11€ que os Falken. A minha dúvida é se a melhor classificação de consumo de combustível na prática traz algum benefício real e prático, que justifique pagar mais pelos pneus se eventualmente depois tiver uma notória poupança de consumo? Ou na prática estas classificações são irrelevantes e mais vale ir para os outros 2 mais baratos com classificação C? Read more”
“I have these on the front of my T6 Ocean 150 and can't fault them. There's nothing special or concerning about them as summer tyres and they're a reasonable price.”
“Your pricing seems way off for Hankook. Here is comparison for 245/40/19 EU prices - Falken FK520 and Hankook Evo K137 (latest and very well performing against Contis, GYs and Michelins) are in 140€ range. GY F1AS6 is 170€ per piece. I went for latest HK Evo K137 and could not be happier - it stacks up very well for a fast driving, is quiet and has excellent response. Falken FK520 is snappy in wet. Goodyears are pensioneer tires, boring as hell.”
Based on 14 community posts
Community sentiment toward the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 is largely positive, with drivers praising its impressive dry and wet grip, responsive handling, and low cabin noise compared to premium alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. Most owners view it as an outstanding value proposition, offering near-flagship performance at a significantly lower price point. Minor criticisms focus on potential treadwear longevity, lack of rim protection, mixed feedback on highway noise, and occasional wheel balance or vibration issues.
“Anyone else running these tires? Is it possible the tire(s) out of round? New hypergram wheels/new tires w/ aluminum hubcentric rings. Has vibrations, but most noticed front right. Balanced again same thing. Took the hub rings off with significant decrease but still there. Will try again with plastic rings followed by swapping wheels front to rear. If still going on will have to live with it”
“Ik heb nog een paar nieuwe banden liggen voor die maat. Continental PremiumContact 7. Had je voor heel weinig mogen hebben. Die zijn echt wel beter dan die Hankooks. Overigens hoeft een goede band niet heel duur te zijn. Ik was zelf niet tevreden mer Hankook. De laatste nieuwe banden die ik heb laten monteren waren Kumho's Ecsta sport PS72. Die zijn weliswaar goedkoop, maar komen uitstekend uit veel testen. Ze hebben ook echt meer grip dan de Hankooks en Vredesteins die ik hiervoor had.”
“Michelin PS5 vs Continental SC 7 vs Kumho PS72 for 437 wheels Looking for new tires for my F30 330i on 437M wheels (225/40R19 & 255/35R19). Main priorities are comfort, steering feel, low noise, and good grip for spirited driving. I’ve previously run Michelin PS5 and loved them, although they got a bit noisy over time. Now I’m deciding between: Michelin PS5 Continental SportContact 7 Kumho PS72 The Kumhos are much cheaper and reviews seem very positive. Are they really close to the PS5/SC7, or is it worth spending more?”
Based on 33 community posts
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis FK520 | B · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 131 | 50 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 9.4/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 A - B A | 320 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 30,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 43 | 43 |
Falken Azenis FK520
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Narrow edge: Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Falken Azenis FK520 if noise and comfort matter most to you.
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 86 vs 74 on handling.
Falken Azenis FK520 scores 71 vs 64 on noise.
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 88 vs 81 on wet.
Falken Azenis FK520 scores 73 vs 68 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 88 vs 81 on our wet score.
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 86 vs 81 on our dry score.
Falken Azenis FK520, 71 vs 64 on our noise score.
Falken Azenis FK520, 73 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
