Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews
Falken Azenis RT 615 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Falken Azenis RT 615 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Neova AD08 is ahead, 71–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 31 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Advan Neova AD08 +1075Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 63 80 Azenis RT 615: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for Azenis RT 615. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
58
Wet
Advan Neova AD08 +1169Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 54 69 Azenis RT 615: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.2 = 58
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of wet for Azenis RT 615. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison65Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 61 Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
60
Comfort
Advan Neova AD08 +868Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 52 67 Azenis RT 615: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 60
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Azenis RT 615 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison67Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 68 Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Azenis RT 615 +163Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 64 61 Azenis RT 615: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 64
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Azenis RT 615. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Advan Neova AD08 +1579Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Advan Neova AD08 Reviews found online 64 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis RT 615 | Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 71 |
| Dry | 65 | 75 |
| Wet | 58 | 69 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 60 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Azenis RT 615
Advan Neova AD08
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Azenis RT 615
Pros
- Excellent value for money and affordable pricing
- Impressive tread life and durability, holding up well to track days and endurance racing
- Good dry grip and predictable handling for beginners learning performance driving
Cons
- Poor performance and hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
- Harder rubber compound compared to traditional semi-slicks, limiting absolute ultimate grip
- Requires careful tire pressure tuning (such as running 3-5 psi higher) to optimize performance
Tire B Advan Neova AD08
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
- Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
- Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction
Cons
- Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
- Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
- Limited size availability for larger rims
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis RT 615 | B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Trackday and Competition tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken Azenis RT 615
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Winner: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — better handling, wet and dry. Where the Falken Azenis RT 615 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Falken Azenis RT 615 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 64 on handling.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 69 vs 58 on wet.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 75 vs 65 on dry.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 68 vs 60 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Azenis RT 615 or Advan Neova AD08?
Which is better in the wet, Azenis RT 615 or Advan Neova AD08?
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 69 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Azenis RT 615 or Advan Neova AD08?
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 75 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Azenis RT 615 or Advan Neova AD08?
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 68 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Azenis RT 615 or Advan Neova AD08?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology