Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis RT-615K vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 6 + 6,420 owner reviews. How we score

ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS is ahead, 78–51

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Azenis RT-615K
Tire AFalken

Azenis RT-615K

Summer tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 6 reviews

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
± 5

Tests 76 · 3 tests Owners 81 · 6,420 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (ice braking)

“I ran the dws on my 700whp corvette ZR1 for 5 years . Never a problem and wear really good . I’ve tracked them in the qtr mile and roll racing . They hooked pretty good ls at the track . Had a 1.60 sixty foot on them”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +20
    80
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 63 (est.)76
    Reviews found online5588

    Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 87.6 = 80

    No road tests of dry for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 53

    Wet

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +28
    81
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 58 (est.)75
    Reviews found online4791

    Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 53

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 91.4 = 81

    No road tests of wet for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 35

    Snow

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +42
    77
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 52 (est.)80
    Reviews found online1172

    Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 11 = 35

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 80.3 + 40% × 71.6 = 77

    No road tests of snow for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 52

    Comfort

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +27
    79
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 64 (est.)74
    Reviews found online4483

    Azenis RT-615K: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 43.5 = 52

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 40% × 74.4 + 60% × 82.5 = 79

    No road tests of comfort for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 58

    Noise

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +16
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 66 (est.)71
    Reviews found online4579

    Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 58

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 71.3 + 40% × 79.1 = 74

    No road tests of noise for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 40

    Treadwear

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +29
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 51 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online2471

    Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 51.3 (est.) + 40% × 23.9 = 40

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +25
    83
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Reviews found online5883
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis RT-615K vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis RT-615KContinental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Relative Score 51 78
Dry 60 80
Wet 53 81
Snow 35 77
Comfort 52 79
Noise 58 74
Treadwear 40 69
Handling (owners) 58 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Azenis RT-615K

± 5

ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis RT-615K

Pros

  • Exceptional dry pavement grip and handling around corners
  • Telepathic and highly responsive steering feedback
  • Predictable and progressive breakaway behavior

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan under aggressive driving
  • Dangerous winter and snow performance
  • Increased road noise at highway speeds
All owner themes in the Azenis RT-615K review

Tire B ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Pros

  • Exceptional wet traction and resistance to hydroplaning
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality that transforms vehicle dynamics
  • Strong dry grip and responsive, predictable cornering capabilities

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter-than-expected lifespan for some drivers
  • Increased road noise and drone developing as the tires wear down
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a 'squishy' feel
All owner themes in the ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis RT-615K

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Positive

The community generally views the DWS 06 Plus as one of the best ultra-high-performance all-season tires. Owners praise its wet and dry grip, ride comfort, quietness, and light-snow manners, and many compare it favorably to the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, often at a lower price. Criticisms include inconsistent tread life (some report about 25k miles while others get 50k), balancing difficulty, soft sidewall or squirmy feel, noise as the tires age, and the fact that they are not a substitute for dedicated winter tires.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Ride comfort and noise#Light snow capability#Versus Michelin PS A/S 4#Tread life variability#Balancing and squirm issues#Value and price#Fitment and wheel sizes

Based on 139 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis RT-615K B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
CategorySummer tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1120
Rim diameters16″16″ – 22″
Tread depth8/32″10/32″
UTQG200 A A560 - 740 A - AA A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure51 psi50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis RT-615K

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — better snow, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken Azenis RT-615K rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 77 vs 35 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 69 vs 40 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 81 vs 53 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 79 vs 52 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken Azenis RT-615K
Tire B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Azenis RT-615K or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Which is better in the wet, Azenis RT-615K or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 81 vs 53 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Azenis RT-615K or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 80 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Azenis RT-615K or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 77 vs 35 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Azenis RT-615K or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 74 vs 58 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Azenis RT-615K or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 79 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Azenis RT-615K or ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS, 69 vs 40 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology