Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis RT-615K vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Advan A050 leads, 61–57 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Advan A050 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KAdvan A050
    Reviews found online6375
  2. 60

    Wet

    Azenis RT-615K +4
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KAdvan A050
    Reviews found online5652
  3. 38

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KAdvan A050
    Reviews found online16–
  4. 61

    Comfort

    Advan A050 +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KAdvan A050
    Reviews found online5259
  5. 60

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KAdvan A050
    Reviews found online50–
  6. 42

    Treadwear

    Advan A050 +5
    47
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KAdvan A050
    Reviews found online2634
  7. 62

    Handling

    Advan A050 +11
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT-615KAdvan A050
    Reviews found online6273
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis RT-615K vs Yokohama Advan A050: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis RT-615KYokohama Advan A050
Relative Score 57 61
Dry 65 73
Wet 60 56
Snow 38 –
Comfort 61 64
Noise 60 –
Treadwear 42 47
Handling 62 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Azenis RT-615K

Advan A050

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis RT-615K

Pros

  • Exceptional dry pavement grip and handling around corners
  • Telepathic and highly responsive steering feedback
  • Predictable and progressive breakaway behavior

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan under aggressive driving
  • Dangerous winter and snow performance
  • Increased road noise at highway speeds
All owner themes in the Azenis RT-615K review

Tire B Advan A050

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
  • Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life

Cons

  • Very high price point compared to competitors
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
  • Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
All owner themes in the Advan A050 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis RT-615K B · Yokohama Advan A050
Category—Summer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth8/32″—
UTQG200 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis RT-615K

Yokohama Advan A050

Winner: Yokohama Advan A050 — better handling, dry and treadwear. Pick the Falken Azenis RT-615K if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan A050 scores 73 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan A050 scores 73 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan A050 scores 47 vs 42 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis RT-615K scores 60 vs 56 on wet.

Tire A · Falken Azenis RT-615K
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A050

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

61

Narrow edge

Advan A050

Amazon