Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 6 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken Azenis RT-615K vs Nitto NT555 G2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 6 + 412 owner reviews. How we score
NT555 G2 is ahead, 58–51
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Azenis RT-615K +555Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 49 Reviews found online 55 64 Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 60
NT555 G2: 60% × 49.1 + 40% × 63.8 = 55
No road tests of dry for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
54
Wet
Azenis RT-615K +351Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 48 Reviews found online 47 54 Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 54
NT555 G2: 60% × 48.3 + 40% × 54 = 51
No road tests of wet for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
35
Snow
NT555 G2 +1348Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 11 33 Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 10.9 = 35
NT555 G2: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.7 = 48
No road tests of snow for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for NT555 G2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
52
Comfort
NT555 G2 +1466Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 44 65 Azenis RT-615K: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 43.6 = 52
NT555 G2: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for NT555 G2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
58
Noise
NT555 G2 +866Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 45 64 Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 58
NT555 G2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66
No road tests of noise for Azenis RT-615K or NT555 G2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
40
Treadwear
NT555 G2 +3676Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 51 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 24 66 Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 51.1 (est.) + 40% × 23.9 = 40
NT555 G2: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 66 = 76
No road tests of treadwear for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
58
Handling (owners)
NT555 G2 +462Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K NT555 G2 Reviews found online 58 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis RT-615K | Nitto NT555 G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 58 |
| Dry | 60 | 55 |
| Wet | 54 | 51 |
| Snow | 35 | 48 |
| Comfort | 52 | 66 |
| Noise | 58 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 40 | 76 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
51
/ 100
Azenis RT-615K
58
/ 100
NT555 G2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Azenis RT-615K
Pros
- Exceptional dry pavement grip and handling around corners
- Telepathic and highly responsive steering feedback
- Predictable and progressive breakaway behavior
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan under aggressive driving
- Dangerous winter and snow performance
- Increased road noise at highway speeds
Tire B NT555 G2
Pros
- Aggressive, visually appealing tread pattern and sidewall design
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands like Michelin or Pirelli
- Long-lasting tread life and slow wear rates for a summer performance tire
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction, with multiple users reporting hydroplaning and a slippery feel in the rain
- Lack of straight-line traction and wheel spin under heavy acceleration, especially on high-horsepower RWD vehicles
- Subpar performance in cooler temperatures or cold conditions, requiring heat to grip properly
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis RT-615K | B · Nitto NT555 G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 88 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 10.2/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 320 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
51
/ 100
Falken Azenis RT-615K
58
/ 100
Nitto NT555 G2
Winner: Nitto NT555 G2 — better treadwear, comfort and snow. Pick the Falken Azenis RT-615K if dry and wet matter most to you. Falken Azenis RT-615K rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Nitto NT555 G2 scores 76 vs 40 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nitto NT555 G2 scores 66 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Nitto NT555 G2 scores 48 vs 35 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Nitto NT555 G2 scores 66 vs 58 on noise.
Tire A · Falken Azenis RT-615K
Tire B · Nitto NT555 G2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Azenis RT-615K or NT555 G2?
Which is better in the wet, Azenis RT-615K or NT555 G2?
Falken Azenis RT-615K, 54 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Azenis RT-615K or NT555 G2?
Falken Azenis RT-615K, 60 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Azenis RT-615K or NT555 G2?
Nitto NT555 G2, 48 vs 35 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Azenis RT-615K or NT555 G2?
Nitto NT555 G2, 66 vs 58 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Azenis RT-615K or NT555 G2?
Nitto NT555 G2, 66 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Azenis RT-615K or NT555 G2?
Nitto NT555 G2, 76 vs 40 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology