Tests 70 · 14 tests Owners 78 · 35 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test (noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken Eurowinter HS01 vs Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Eurowinter HS01 leads, 74–73 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 5 tests Owners 78 · 15 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
BluEarth Winter V905 +177Why this score
Source Eurowinter HS01 BluEarth Winter V905 Professional tests (TWG score) 73 74 Reviews found online 79 82 Dry Braking (% of best) 99% 100% Dry Handling (% of best) 99% 99% -
83
Wet
Eurowinter HS01 +578Why this score
Source Eurowinter HS01 BluEarth Winter V905 Professional tests (TWG score) 84 75 Reviews found online 83 82 Wet Braking (% of best) 95% 90% Wet Handling (% of best) 98% 96% -
67
Snow
Eurowinter HS01 +166Why this score
Source Eurowinter HS01 BluEarth Winter V905 Professional tests (TWG score) 61 57 Reviews found online 78 79 Snow Braking (% of best) 96% 95% Snow Handling (% of best) 96% 96% Snow Traction (% of best) 90% 92% -
72
Comfort
BluEarth Winter V905 +274Why this score
Source Eurowinter HS01 BluEarth Winter V905 Professional tests (TWG score) 69 73 Reviews found online 76 77 -
53
Noise
BluEarth Winter V905 +1164Why this score
Source Eurowinter HS01 BluEarth Winter V905 Professional tests (TWG score) 39 61 Reviews found online 75 69 -
73
Treadwear
Eurowinter HS01 +568Why this score
Source Eurowinter HS01 BluEarth Winter V905 Professional tests (TWG score) 71 66 Reviews found online 76 72 -
76
Handling
BluEarth Winter V905 +581Why this score
Source Eurowinter HS01 BluEarth Winter V905 Reviews found online 76 81
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Eurowinter HS01 | Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 73 |
| Dry | 76 | 77 |
| Wet | 83 | 78 |
| Snow | 67 | 66 |
| Comfort | 72 | 74 |
| Noise | 53 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 68 |
| Handling | 76 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Eurowinter HS01
73
/ 100
BluEarth Winter V905
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Eurowinter HS01 | BluEarth Winter V905 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #3/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | −1.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #2/8 · 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 99% #5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | +0.2 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 77% #18/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 86% #10/10 · 2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test | −9.3 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #1/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 95% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | +5.1 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 99% #2/8 · 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 77% #13/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +22.1 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 73% #6/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 77% #10/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | −3.5 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 56% #15/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 78% #13/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | −22.1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 6% #16/17 · 2022 ADAC SUV Winter Tyre Test - 215/60 R16 | 5% #20/51 · 2018 51 Winter Tyre Shootout | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 96% #6/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test | 95% #9/10 · 2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test | +1.0 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 96% #5/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test | 96% #18/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | −0.3 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 90% #20/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 92% #2/10 · 2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test | −2.0 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 98% #5/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 94% #5/10 · 2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test | +4.0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 60% #10/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | 80% #5/10 · 2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test | −20.0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 80% #4/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | 90% #3/10 · 2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test | −10.0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Snow Handling | Subj | 40% #9/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | 60% #8/10 · 2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test | −20.0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 30% #9/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2019 Auto Center Winter Tyre Test | −70.0 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #18/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0% #6/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 0.0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 90% #16/44 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | +4.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #6/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 96% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | +2.0 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eurowinter HS01
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- Strong traction and handling in deep snow and ice
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Higher rolling resistance noted by some users
- Inconsistent braking confidence on wet or slick asphalt for a small subset of drivers
- Increased road noise at higher speeds or when over-inflated
Tire B BluEarth Winter V905
Pros
- Exceptional traction and handling on snow and ice
- Strong performance on cold, wet, and dry pavement
- High level of steering precision and road feedback
Cons
- Reports of higher-than-average road noise
- Mixed feedback on tread longevity, with some users noting rapid wear
- Occasional understeer in wet conditions when temperatures are higher
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Eurowinter HS01 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 99 | 132 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 21″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Falken Eurowinter HS01
73
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
Too close to call: Falken Eurowinter HS01 and Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 are within 2 points overall. Falken Eurowinter HS01 is stronger on wet and treadwear. Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 is stronger on noise and handling.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 scores 64 vs 53 on noise.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 83 vs 78 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 73 vs 68 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905 scores 81 vs 76 on handling.
Tire A · Falken Eurowinter HS01
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.