Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 3 reviews
Falken FK453CC vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 9 road tests and 3 + 1,371 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 SUV is ahead, 80–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 79 · 9 tests Owners 75 · 1,371 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +2584Why this score
Source FK453CC Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 54 81 FK453CC: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 59
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 85.4 + 40% × 81.1 = 84
No road tests of dry for FK453CC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
61
Wet
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +2788Why this score
Source FK453CC Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 92 Reviews found online 58 81 FK453CC: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 92.3 + 40% × 81.1 = 88
No road tests of wet for FK453CC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
58
Comfort
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +260Why this score
Source FK453CC Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 54 Reviews found online 48 70 FK453CC: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.8 = 58
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 54.2 + 40% × 69.8 = 60
No road tests of comfort for FK453CC. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison61Why this score
Source FK453CC Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 53 Reviews found online – 74 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 74.2 = 61
-
57
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +1471Why this score
Source FK453CC Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 51 65 FK453CC: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 64.8 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for FK453CC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
53
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +2578Why this score
Source FK453CC Pilot Sport 4 SUV Reviews found online 53 78
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken FK453CC | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 80 |
| Dry | 59 | 84 |
| Wet | 61 | 88 |
| Comfort | 58 | 60 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 53 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
FK453CC
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | FK453CC | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/7 2016 Autobild 4x4 / SUV Tyre Test | #5/9 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A FK453CC
Pros
- Improved dry handling performance compared to factory-fitted tires
- Strong value proposition for the price point
- Capable performance during long-distance motorway driving
Cons
- Harsh ride quality on uneven or potholed urban roads
- Negative impact on fuel economy
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
Tire B Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Pros
- Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
- Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
- Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling
Cons
- Higher-than-average purchase price
- Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
- Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Falken FK453CC
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is generally very positive, with owners highlighting its strong grip, handling precision, and suitability for heavy performance SUVs. Users frequently compare it favorably to older Latitude Sport 3 and standard passenger tires, though they emphasize its summer-only limitation below 40°F and note trade-offs in price and tread life.
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
“Figured I would update this thread. Ended up buying a set of four brand new 18" Saab 9-7X wheels that were shipped over, and went with Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires in 255/55R18 109Y XL flavor. This is the first set of French made Michelins I've purchased, and they all were manufactured in December 2021. Also got some chrome McGard spline drive lug nuts. The ride is definitely firmer than it was compared to the 255/60R17 106V tires on there previously, but that's a good thing in my book. Only put 18 miles on them so far, so I can't say all that much. However, I definitely like them so far.”
“Have a 2014 CTTS with 21" wheels. Just had Michelin PilotSport4 SUV All-season put on. Before that had Michelin PilotSport4S. Have about 1K miles on the new tires, and no experience with it in winter weather yet, but prefer the ride quality over the PS4S. The PS4SUV are a softer ride, yet still have plenty of grip when I hit the "Sport" button. IMO, the PS4S is overkill for the Cayenne. Obviously, subjective and YMMV. Does your wife engage in "spirited" driving? As background, I have PS4S tires on my 2016 Spyder and love them.”
Based on 37 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken FK453CC | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 1 | 65 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ | 17″ – 23″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken FK453CC
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken FK453CC rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 88 vs 61 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 84 vs 59 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 78 vs 53 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 71 vs 57 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
FK453CC or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, FK453CC or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 88 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, FK453CC or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 84 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, FK453CC or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, FK453CC or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 71 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology