Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 3 reviews
Falken Landair A/T T110 vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Geolandar SUV is ahead, 68–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Geolandar SUV +968Why this score
Source Landair A/T T110 Geolandar SUV Reviews found online 54 68 -
56
Wet
Geolandar SUV +1672Why this score
Source Landair A/T T110 Geolandar SUV Reviews found online 52 73 -
63
Comfort
Geolandar SUV +265Why this score
Source Landair A/T T110 Geolandar SUV Reviews found online 57 61 -
63
Treadwear
Geolandar SUV +265Why this score
Source Landair A/T T110 Geolandar SUV Reviews found online 61 65 -
53
Handling
Geolandar SUV +1770Why this score
Source Landair A/T T110 Geolandar SUV Reviews found online 53 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Landair A/T T110 | Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 68 |
| Dry | 59 | 68 |
| Wet | 56 | 72 |
| Comfort | 63 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 65 |
| Handling | 53 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Landair A/T T110
Geolandar SUV
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Landair A/T T110
Pros
- Affordable budget-friendly pricing
- Reasonable and predictable performance in dry weather conditions
- Decent upgrade over older tires like the Bridgestone on older compact SUVs
Cons
- Poor wet-road traction and handling
- Twitchy and unstable feel during high-speed cornering
- Lack of confidence-inspiring safety in wet weather, leading some to consider early replacement
Tire B Geolandar SUV
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High level of ride comfort
- Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes
Cons
- Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
- Not suitable for high-performance driving
- Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Landair A/T T110 | B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 12 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 16″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken Landair A/T T110
Yokohama Geolandar SUV
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar SUV — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 70 vs 53 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 72 vs 56 on wet.
Yokohama Geolandar SUV scores 68 vs 59 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.