Tests – · none yet Owners 33 · 128 reviews
Falken Linam VAN01 vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Geolandar H/T G056 is ahead, 69–43
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 35 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
45
Dry
Geolandar H/T G056 +2671Why this score
Source Linam VAN01 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 32 74 -
43
Wet
Geolandar H/T G056 +2770Why this score
Source Linam VAN01 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 34 69 -
–
Snow
No comparison59Why this score
Source Linam VAN01 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online – 51 -
54
Comfort
Geolandar H/T G056 +1670Why this score
Source Linam VAN01 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 39 70 -
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Linam VAN01 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online – 72 -
44
Treadwear
Geolandar H/T G056 +2266Why this score
Source Linam VAN01 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 29 66 -
34
Handling
Geolandar H/T G056 +3569Why this score
Source Linam VAN01 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 34 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Linam VAN01 | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 43 | 69 |
| Dry | 45 | 71 |
| Wet | 43 | 70 |
| Snow | – | 59 |
| Comfort | 54 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 44 | 66 |
| Handling | 34 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Linam VAN01
Geolandar H/T G056
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Linam VAN01
Pros
- Good wet and dry traction compared to worn tires
- Low road noise and smooth ride comfort
- Stiff sidewalls and durable tread life for many users
Cons
- Some users report severe wheel spin and poor traction in damp or wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with extreme outliers reporting premature wear down to 3mm quickly
- Lack of braking confidence reported by a minority of drivers in the wet
Tire B Geolandar H/T G056
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry pavement handling and stability
- Impressive tread longevity for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
- Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
- Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Linam VAN01 | B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Van | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 26 | 56 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 17″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken Linam VAN01
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 69 vs 34 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 70 vs 43 on wet.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 71 vs 45 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 66 vs 44 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.