Head-to-head Updated

Falken Rubitrek A/T01 vs Falken WildPeak A/T4W — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 1 + 1,062 owner reviews. How we score

WildPeak A/T4W is ahead, 78–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Rubitrek A/T01
Tire AFalken

Rubitrek A/T01

All-Terrain tire

± 7Provisional

Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review

Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2025 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Test (noise (tester's mark))

Falken WildPeak A/T4W
Tire BFalken

WildPeak A/T4W

All-Terrain tire

± 5

Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 84 · 1,062 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 30 in 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test (snow handling (tester's mark))

“New Wildpeak A/T4Ws Added some Wildpeak AT4s in 275/60r20 on my stock suspension ‘24 STX. Replaced the chrome lugs with black Gorillas and added rear well liners. Looks so much better than the OEM Hankooks.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    WildPeak A/T4W +12
    80
    Why this score
    SourceRubitrek A/T01WildPeak A/T4W
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7076
    Reviews found online6687

    Rubitrek A/T01: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 66 = 68

    WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 87.1 = 80

  2. 72

    Wet

    WildPeak A/T4W +8
    80
    Why this score
    SourceRubitrek A/T01WildPeak A/T4W
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7277
    Reviews found online7186

    Rubitrek A/T01: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 70.6 = 72

    WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 86.4 = 80

  3. 69

    Snow

    WildPeak A/T4W +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceRubitrek A/T01WildPeak A/T4W
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)72
    Reviews found online6776
    Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–174%85%
    Ice Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–186%90%
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–178%83%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–172%75%
    Snow Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–168%94%

    Rubitrek A/T01: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 69

    WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 75.7 = 73

    No road tests of snow for Rubitrek A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    WildPeak A/T4W +13
    75
    Why this score
    SourceRubitrek A/T01WildPeak A/T4W
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests6971
    Reviews found online5777

    Rubitrek A/T01: 40% × 69 + 60% × 56.8 = 62

    WildPeak A/T4W: 40% × 70.7 + 60% × 77.3 = 75

  5. 72

    Noise

    WildPeak A/T4W +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceRubitrek A/T01WildPeak A/T4W
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7572
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)77

    Rubitrek A/T01: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 72

    WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 77.3 = 74

    No owner ratings of noise for Rubitrek A/T01. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    80
    Why this score
    SourceRubitrek A/T01WildPeak A/T4W
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online–89

    WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 88.9 = 80

    No road tests of treadwear for WildPeak A/T4W. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    WildPeak A/T4W +11
    75
    Why this score
    SourceRubitrek A/T01WildPeak A/T4W
    Reviews found online6475
Scores at a glance
Falken Rubitrek A/T01 vs Falken WildPeak A/T4W: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Rubitrek A/T01Falken WildPeak A/T4W
Relative Score 69 78
Dry 68 80
Wet 72 80
Snow 69 73
Comfort 62 75
Noise 72 74
Treadwear – 80
Handling (owners) 64 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Rubitrek A/T01

± 5

WildPeak A/T4W

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Falken Rubitrek A/T01 finished ahead 0 times and Falken WildPeak A/T4W 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryRubitrek A/T01WildPeak A/T4WΔHead-to-head
Ice Braking Snow 74% 85% −11.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test · 265/70 R17
Ice Traction Snow 86% 90% −4.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test · 265/70 R17
Snow Braking Snow 78% 83% −5.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test · 265/70 R17
Snow Handling (tester's mark) Snow 68% 94% −26.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test · 265/70 R17
Snow Traction Snow 72% 75% −3.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test · 265/70 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #23/30 #3/30 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test · 265/70 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Rubitrek A/T01

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B WildPeak A/T4W

Pros

  • Remarkably quiet and smooth on-road performance for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Exceptional traction across diverse surfaces including dirt, gravel, mud, and snow
  • Robust sidewall durability and longevity with minimal tread wear reported over thousands of miles

Cons

  • Noticeable reduction in fuel economy due to the heavier tire weight
  • Occasional difficulty with high-speed balancing and vibrations
  • Some mixed feedback regarding grip on wet pavement or hard-packed ice
All owner themes in the WildPeak A/T4W review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Rubitrek A/T01

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken WildPeak A/T4W

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Falken Wildpeak A/T4W is largely positive, with owners praising its aggressive aesthetics, quiet highway ride, and reliable traction in wet and snowy conditions. Most discussions focus on fitment clearance and upsized setups, with very little to no rubbing reported across multiple platforms. The primary critique and discussion point centers on its noticeable tire weight, associated MPG penalties, and confusing load-rating weight discrepancies.

r/ram_trucks ·63 upvotes ·2025-04-24

“Falken Wildpeak A/T4W (P275/60R20) Review Simple 2000mi review on Falken Wildpeak A/T 4W in P275/60R20 (33”). Fit - They do rub slightly with stock suspension, but only with the wheel turned 100%. It’s really not an issue and I will probably do some trimming or a level eventually. Fuel Efficiency - Seems to be about a 2mpg decrease compared to highway tires. Averaged 18mpg from Denver to Utah. Noise - Zero noticeable increase in road noise. Handling - On pavement they seem to handle the same as a highway tire. On a snow covered highway they performed excellent. Gave me a lot more confidence than my previous Wrangler SR-As. I haven’t tested them in very technical terrain yet but on the basic 4wd roads pictured, they did great.”

wranglerforum.com ·2024-01-07

“Seems they're offering 3 ply sidewalls now on selected sizes but their web site doesn't say what sizes. Part of the reason AT3W were a one time tire for me was the 2 ply sidewalls, so seen 3 plies is encouraging for me to update these new tires to the "Options to look at next time i'll buy AT tires list". Now with that said, they got porkier. I had them before in 315/70/17 E at 73 lbs, now they're 76lbs and they're C rated. Will they have 3 plies in C ? If they don't then they go back to the list of tires i don't care to look again The 35x12.5x17 E are now 78lbs. i'd assume these would feature 3 ply sidewalls but that's damn heavy for AT. Their sidewall looks better than before though, little more aggressive site bites and lettering which is also encouraging as a feature i look at for AT's.”

f150tremor.com ·2024-01-22

“It doesn't make sense to me either. Their 285/75R18 tire at 10 ply, HD sidewall and 1" taller than the C load is lighter. The guy in the video mentions the discrepancies in info on weights, but said they weighed in at 68.8lbs per his home scale for the 285/70R18 C load.”

Top themes
#tire weight and mpg impact#low road noise#fitment and rubbing clearance#wet and snow traction#aggressive sidewall aesthetics#ply construction and durability#comparison to A/T3W

Based on 41 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Rubitrek A/T01 B · Falken WildPeak A/T4W
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth—13/32″
UTQG—660 B B
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Rubitrek A/T01

Falken WildPeak A/T4W

Winner: Falken WildPeak A/T4W — better comfort, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken Rubitrek A/T01 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Falken WildPeak A/T4W scores 75 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken WildPeak A/T4W scores 80 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken WildPeak A/T4W scores 75 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken WildPeak A/T4W scores 80 vs 72 on wet.

Tire A · Falken Rubitrek A/T01
Tire B · Falken WildPeak A/T4W

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Rubitrek A/T01 or WildPeak A/T4W?

Which is better in the wet, Rubitrek A/T01 or WildPeak A/T4W?

Falken WildPeak A/T4W, 80 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Rubitrek A/T01 or WildPeak A/T4W?

Falken WildPeak A/T4W, 80 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Rubitrek A/T01 or WildPeak A/T4W?

Falken WildPeak A/T4W, 73 vs 69 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Rubitrek A/T01 or WildPeak A/T4W?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Rubitrek A/T01 or WildPeak A/T4W?

Falken WildPeak A/T4W, 75 vs 62 on our comfort score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology