tirewheelguide

Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 73–66

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Wildpeak WP A/T01 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceWildpeak WP A/T01DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6977

    Wildpeak WP A/T01: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 68

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +9
    74
    Why this score
    SourceWildpeak WP A/T01DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6375

    Wildpeak WP A/T01: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceWildpeak WP A/T01DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–62

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceWildpeak WP A/T01DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6875

    Wildpeak WP A/T01: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Wildpeak WP A/T01 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceWildpeak WP A/T01DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–73

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +10
    71
    Why this score
    SourceWildpeak WP A/T01DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5875

    Wildpeak WP A/T01: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.4 = 61

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceWildpeak WP A/T01DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online6571
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken Wildpeak WP A/T01Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 66 73
Dry 68 73
Wet 65 74
Snow – 65
Comfort 69 72
Noise – 70
Treadwear 61 71
Handling (owners) 65 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Wildpeak WP A/T01

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Wildpeak WP A/T01

Pros

  • Low road noise and comfortable ride quality on highways and rural roads
  • Good dry traction and competent performance on mild off-road trails
  • Balanced easily with minimal weight during installation

Cons

  • Dramatically reduced wet grip and dangerous sliding tendencies in heavy rain as the tires age
  • Noticeable degradation in snow and ice traction by the second and third winter seasons
  • Prone to wheel spin on steep wet inclines requiring the engagement of 4WD
All owner themes in the Wildpeak WP A/T01 review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—29
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—13/32″
UTQG—560 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Outlined White Lettering
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 68 on dry.

Tire A · Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Wildpeak WP A/T01 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology