Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 33 reviews
Pirelli Scorpion ATR vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 33 + 186 owner reviews. How we score
DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 186 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +174Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 75 77 Scorpion ATR: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
No road tests of dry for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
67
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +774Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 65 76 Scorpion ATR: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 74
No road tests of wet for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Snow
Scorpion ATR +164Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 61 59 Scorpion ATR: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 58.9 = 64
No road tests of snow for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +473Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 69 74 Scorpion ATR: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.2 = 69
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +169Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 71 73 Scorpion ATR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 69
No road tests of noise for Scorpion ATR or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +773Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 66 78 Scorpion ATR: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 66
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Scorpion ATR +170Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR DynaPro A/TM RF10 Reviews found online 71 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Pirelli Scorpion ATR | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 72 |
| Dry | 73 | 74 |
| Wet | 67 | 74 |
| Snow | 65 | 64 |
| Comfort | 69 | 73 |
| Noise | 68 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Scorpion ATR
DynaPro A/TM RF10
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Pirelli Scorpion ATR finished ahead 0 times and Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Scorpion ATR | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #15/13 | #14/13 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 SA4x4 All-Terrain Tire Test R17 · 265/65R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Scorpion ATR
Pros
- Exceptionally smooth and quiet ride on the highway for an all-terrain tire
- Confident dry and wet traction with reliable handling in rain and mud
- Sturdy construction offering good puncture resistance on rough terrain
Cons
- Poor performance in deep, hard-packed snow and ice
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing rapid wear or steel belts showing prematurely
- Wet traction and hydroplaning resistance decline noticeably as the tread wears down
Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Pirelli Scorpion ATR | B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 18 | 29 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | 440 A B | 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 10 | 10 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Pirelli Scorpion ATR
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Narrow edge: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Where the Pirelli Scorpion ATR is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 67 on wet.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 66 on treadwear.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 69 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Scorpion ATR or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Which is better in the wet, Scorpion ATR or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Scorpion ATR or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Scorpion ATR or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Scorpion ATR or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Scorpion ATR or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Scorpion ATR or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology