Head-to-head Updated

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 186 + 100 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: DynaPro A/TM RF10 and Trail-Terrain T/A are level at 71.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Level
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Trail-Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7776

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Trail-Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7569

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Trail-Terrain T/A +12
    77
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Trail-Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online6282

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 74 (est.) + 40% × 82.4 = 77

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Trail-Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7569

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Trail-Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7371

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 69

    No road tests of noise for DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Trail-Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7575

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Trail-Terrain T/A
    Reviews found online7169
Scores at a glance
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Relative Score 71 71
Dry 73 73
Wet 74 69
Snow 65 77
Comfort 72 69
Noise 70 69
Treadwear 71 71
Handling (owners) 71 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Trail-Terrain T/A

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDynaPro A/TM RF10Trail-Terrain T/AΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/5 2019 4x4 Australia All-Terrain Tire Test R17 #8/8 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Tire B Trail-Terrain T/A

Pros

  • Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain tire
  • Excellent traction and predictability in snow and winter conditions
  • Good ride comfort and smoothness on paved roads

Cons

  • Some users report poor wet weather traction and rear-wheel slippage
  • A minority of reviewers noted high noise levels on paved tarmac
  • Concerns regarding longevity with some users experiencing faster tread wear
All owner themes in the Trail-Terrain T/A review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2950
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth13/32″11 - 13/32″
UTQG560 A B660 A A - B
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure44 psi44 - 51 psi
Sizes in common2020

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A

Too close to call: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 and BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A are within 2 points overall. Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is stronger on wet and comfort. BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A is stronger on snow.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 77 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 69 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Tire B · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Trail-Terrain T/A?

Which is better in the wet, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Trail-Terrain T/A?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Trail-Terrain T/A?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Trail-Terrain T/A?

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 77 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Trail-Terrain T/A?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Trail-Terrain T/A?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Trail-Terrain T/A?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology