Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 10 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Wildpeak WP A/T01 is ahead, 61–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Wildpeak WP A/T01 +558Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Dynapro HP2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 61 52 Wildpeak WP A/T01: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 63
Dynapro HP2: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 58
No road tests of dry for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
62
Wet
Wildpeak WP A/T01 +656Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Dynapro HP2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 59 50 Wildpeak WP A/T01: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
Dynapro HP2: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
No road tests of wet for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Snow
Level59Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Dynapro HP2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 52 51 Wildpeak WP A/T01: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 59
Dynapro HP2: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 59
No road tests of snow for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
63
Comfort
Wildpeak WP A/T01 +1053Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Dynapro HP2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 60 46 Wildpeak WP A/T01: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.2 = 63
Dynapro HP2: 40% × 64.1 (est.) + 60% × 45.9 = 53
No road tests of comfort for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
61
Treadwear
Wildpeak WP A/T01 +952Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Dynapro HP2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 58 42 Wildpeak WP A/T01: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 61
Dynapro HP2: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 52
No road tests of treadwear for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Wildpeak WP A/T01 +1048Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Dynapro HP2 Reviews found online 58 48
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 | Hankook Dynapro HP2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 56 |
| Dry | 63 | 58 |
| Wet | 62 | 56 |
| Snow | 59 | 59 |
| Comfort | 63 | 53 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 52 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 48 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
Wildpeak WP A/T01
56
/ 100
Dynapro HP2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Wildpeak WP A/T01
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable on-road, with several reviewers noting very little road noise, including on motorways and rural roads
- Strong dry-road performance and capable off-road/light trail traction
- Good initial wet grip and road manners when new; one reviewer found them quieter and better gripping than their previous BFGoodrich T/As
Cons
- Wet-weather grip that is poor or deteriorates with age, with reports of aquaplaning, wheelspin on hills or tight turns, and a need to engage 4WD in rain
- Snow and ice performance is weak, particularly in mushy snow, and can fade markedly after the first season or two
- Tread life is inconsistent and often shorter than expected: about 30k (roadworthy only) on one Patrol, 40-45k per set for another owner, and noticeable degradation by 20,000 km for another
Tire B Dynapro HP2
Pros
- Reliable handling and roadability on dry pavement
- Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance contributing to high MPG
- Capably handles towing duties on all-wheel-drive vehicles
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by multiple users
- Poor wet weather performance and dangerous sliding tendencies in rain
- Inconsistent snow traction, with some users noting a lack of confidence in winter conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 | B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 44 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 360 - 820 A A |
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01
56
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HP2
Winner: Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 — better comfort, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro HP2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 scores 63 vs 53 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 scores 58 vs 48 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 scores 61 vs 52 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 scores 62 vs 56 on wet.
Tire A · Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Wildpeak WP A/T01 or Dynapro HP2?
Which is better in the wet, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or Dynapro HP2?
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01, 62 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or Dynapro HP2?
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01, 63 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or Dynapro HP2?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 59 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or Dynapro HP2?
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01, 63 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or Dynapro HP2?
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01, 61 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology