Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZE502 vs Toyo Proxes TR1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 2 + 903 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE502
Tire AFalken

ZE502

Summer Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 2 reviews (needs 5)

Toyo Proxes TR1
Tire BToyo

Proxes TR1

Summer

± 9

Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 903 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (comfort (tester's mark))

“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    59
    Why this score
    SourceZE502Proxes TR1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–53
    Reviews found online–69

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 69.4 = 59

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceZE502Proxes TR1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–66
    Reviews found online–70

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 70.2 = 68

  3. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceZE502Proxes TR1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–68
    Reviews found online–59

    Proxes TR1: 40% × 68.1 + 60% × 59.4 = 63

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceZE502Proxes TR1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–68
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 68

    No owner ratings of noise for Proxes TR1. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceZE502Proxes TR1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online–60

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TR1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceZE502Proxes TR1
    Reviews found online–72
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZE502Proxes TR1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–71
Scores at a glance
Falken ZE502 vs Toyo Proxes TR1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZE502Toyo Proxes TR1
Relative Score – 64
Dry – 59
Wet – 68
Comfort – 63
Noise – 68
Treadwear – 63
Handling (owners) – 72
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZE502

± 9

Proxes TR1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZE502

Pros

  • Strong dry pavement grip and road feedback
  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Comfortable ride quality suitable for long-distance motorway travel

Cons

  • Wet weather grip is adequate but lacks confidence at the limit
  • Potential for premature tread deformation or uneven wear
  • Requires strict adherence to alignment and balancing to maintain performance
All owner themes in the ZE502 review

Tire B Proxes TR1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and responsive steering feedback
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier-one brands
  • Attractive and aggressive directional tread design

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise and humming sounds at certain speeds
  • Soft sidewalls that can cause a slight squirm or delayed initial steering response
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear axles
All owner themes in the Proxes TR1 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZE502

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Toyo Proxes TR1

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Toyo Proxes TR1 is mixed, with users frequently noting an attractive price point and smooth, comfortable ride when compared to factory tires or run-flats. However, multiple drivers report shortcomings in wet-weather performance, cold grip, and road noise as mileage increases, while several criticize its soft sidewalls for creating imprecise handling at the limit.

Top themes
#Wet grip performance#Soft sidewall stiffness#Affordable price point#Road noise issues#Ride comfort comparison#Handling at limit#T1R model confusion

Based on 36 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZE502 B · Toyo Proxes TR1
CategorySummer Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—61
Rim diameters—14″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZE502

Toyo Proxes TR1

Only Toyo Proxes TR1 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Falken ZE502
Tire B · Toyo Proxes TR1

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology