Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZE912 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 200 + 1,589 owner reviews. How we score

ZE912 leads, 66–63 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE912
Tire AFalken

ZE912

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews

“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire BHankook

Kinergy Eco 2

Summer

Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 55 · 1,589 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    ZE912 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 67 (est.)72
    Reviews found online6555

    ZE912: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 55.4 = 65

    No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Kinergy Eco 2 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6761

    ZE912: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.5 + 40% × 60.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 68

    Comfort

    ZE912 +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6652

    ZE912: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for ZE912 or Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–75
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy Eco 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 63

    Treadwear

    ZE912 +6
    57
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6051

    ZE912: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 63

    Handling (owners)

    ZE912 +9
    54
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Kinergy Eco 2
    Reviews found online6354
Scores at a glance
Falken ZE912 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZE912Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Relative Score 66 63
Dry 66 65
Wet 68 69
Comfort 68 61
Noise – 72
Treadwear 63 57
Handling (owners) 63 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZE912

Kinergy Eco 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryZE912Kinergy Eco 2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #13/14 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 #8/11 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZE912

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
  • Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
All owner themes in the ZE912 review

Tire B Kinergy Eco 2

Pros

  • Reliable dry and wet road grip
  • Good value for the price point
  • Slow and even tread wear / long-lasting durability

Cons

  • Notable road noise reported by some users
  • Stiff ride quality that can amplify road bumps
  • Reduced performance and grip in wet or cold conditions as tread wears down
All owner themes in the Kinergy Eco 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZE912

Mixed

Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.

Top themes
#affordable pricing and value#quiet and comfortable ride#poor snow and winter performance#noise level over time#treadwear and longevity#sidewall stiffness and handling#wet road traction

Based on 50 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZE912 B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—48
Rim diameters—13″ – 17″

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZE912

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

Narrow edge: Falken ZE912 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. Where the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken ZE912 scores 63 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken ZE912 scores 68 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken ZE912 scores 63 vs 57 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken ZE912
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZE912 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Which is better in the wet, ZE912 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZE912 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ZE912 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Falken ZE912, 68 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZE912 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Falken ZE912, 63 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology