Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZE912 vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 200 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

ZE912 leads, 66–63 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE912
Tire AFalken

ZE912

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews

“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”

Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire BNexen

N Fera SU1

Summer

Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 63 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    ZE912 +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 67 (est.)55
    Reviews found online6565

    ZE912: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 55 + 40% × 64.7 = 59

    No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    ZE912 +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)62
    Reviews found online6768

    ZE912: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 61.9 + 40% × 67.6 = 64

    No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–49

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 49.2 = 58

    No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    ZE912 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)66
    Reviews found online6667

    ZE912: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 65.7 + 40% × 66.6 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for ZE912. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–69
    Reviews found online–70

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 70 = 70

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    N Fera SU1 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6061

    ZE912: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 61.4 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    N Fera SU1 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Fera SU1
    Reviews found online6366
Scores at a glance
Falken ZE912 vs Nexen N Fera SU1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZE912Nexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score 66 63
Dry 66 59
Wet 68 64
Snow – 58
Comfort 68 66
Noise – 70
Treadwear 63 67
Handling (owners) 63 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZE912

N Fera SU1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryZE912N Fera SU1ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #13/14 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 #5/6 2023 APAC Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZE912

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
  • Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
All owner themes in the ZE912 review

Tire B N Fera SU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
  • Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
  • Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
  • Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
All owner themes in the N Fera SU1 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZE912

Mixed

Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.

Top themes
#affordable pricing and value#quiet and comfortable ride#poor snow and winter performance#noise level over time#treadwear and longevity#sidewall stiffness and handling#wet road traction

Based on 50 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N Fera SU1

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZE912 B · Nexen N Fera SU1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—97
Rim diameters—15″ – 24″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZE912

Nexen N Fera SU1

Narrow edge: Falken ZE912 — better dry and wet. Pick the Nexen N Fera SU1 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZE912 scores 66 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZE912 scores 68 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 67 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken ZE912
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZE912 or N Fera SU1?

Which is better in the wet, ZE912 or N Fera SU1?

Falken ZE912, 68 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZE912 or N Fera SU1?

Falken ZE912, 66 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ZE912 or N Fera SU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ZE912 or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 67 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology