Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZE912 vs Nitto NT555 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 200 + 13 owner reviews. How we score

ZE912 is ahead, 66–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE912
Tire AFalken

ZE912

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews

“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”

Nitto NT555
Tire BNitto

NT555

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 13 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    ZE912 +9
    57
    Why this score
    SourceZE912NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6552

    ZE912: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    NT555: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 57

    No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for NT555. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    ZE912 +14
    54
    Why this score
    SourceZE912NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6749

    ZE912: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    NT555: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 54

    No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for NT555. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    42
    Why this score
    SourceZE912NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online–23

    NT555: 60% × 54.5 (est.) + 40% × 23.4 = 42

    No road tests of snow for NT555. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    ZE912 +9
    59
    Why this score
    SourceZE912NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6649

    ZE912: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68

    NT555: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for ZE912 or NT555. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceZE912NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–54

    NT555: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 62

    No road tests of noise for NT555. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    ZE912 +8
    55
    Why this score
    SourceZE912NT555
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6048

    ZE912: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    NT555: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 48.1 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for NT555. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    ZE912 +9
    54
    Why this score
    SourceZE912NT555
    Reviews found online6354
Scores at a glance
Falken ZE912 vs Nitto NT555: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZE912Nitto NT555
Relative Score 66 56
Dry 66 57
Wet 68 54
Snow – 42
Comfort 68 59
Noise – 62
Treadwear 63 55
Handling (owners) 63 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZE912

NT555

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZE912

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
  • Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
All owner themes in the ZE912 review

Tire B NT555

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and sticky, hot-tar-like road adhesion
  • Enhanced handling and high-speed stability
  • Sporty aesthetic and semi-slick feel favored by enthusiasts

Cons

  • Subpar wet weather traction and dangerous in winter/cold conditions
  • Can struggle to maintain traction on higher-horsepower vehicles (e.g., V8 setups)
  • Notable road noise that increases as the tire wears
All owner themes in the NT555 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZE912

Mixed

Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.

Top themes
#affordable pricing and value#quiet and comfortable ride#poor snow and winter performance#noise level over time#treadwear and longevity#sidewall stiffness and handling#wet road traction

Based on 50 community posts

Tire B

Nitto NT555

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZE912 B · Nitto NT555
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—53
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth—10.3/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZE912

Nitto NT555

Winner: Falken ZE912 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nitto NT555 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZE912 scores 68 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZE912 scores 66 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken ZE912 scores 68 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken ZE912 scores 63 vs 54 on handling.

Tire A · Falken ZE912
Tire B · Nitto NT555

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZE912 or NT555?

Which is better in the wet, ZE912 or NT555?

Falken ZE912, 68 vs 54 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZE912 or NT555?

Falken ZE912, 66 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ZE912 or NT555?

Falken ZE912, 68 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZE912 or NT555?

Falken ZE912, 63 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology